UNITED
STATES
DEPARTMENT
OF
THE
INTERIOR
Harold
L.
Ickes,
Secretary
GEOLOGICAL
SURVEY
W.
C.
Mendenhall,
Director
Water-Supply
Paper
819
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
THEIR
GEOLOGIC
RELATIONS
AND
ORIGIN
RY
REPORT
D.
F.
HEWT«NDOG.
W.
CRICKMAY
V
»
**t*
Prepared
in
cqope?ktio^^lh
the
GEORGIA
DEPARTipSff
OFJiipRESTRY
AND
UNITED
STATES
GOVERNMENT
PRINTING
OFFICE
WASHINGTON
:
1937
For
sale
by
theJBuperintendent
of
Documents,
Washington,
D.
C.
Price
25
cents
CONTENTS
Page
Abstract
_________________________________________________________
1
Introduction
______________________________________________________
1
Scope
of
the
investigation._________________________________________
2
Acknowledgments-
________________________________________________
2
Surface
features.___--_------___-_-___________.________-_--_____-__
2
Warm
springs
of
the
region_________________________________________
3
Warm
Springs.___________________________________
___________
4
Parkman
Spring_______________________________________________
9
Brown's
Spring_________-_-____________________________________
10
Thundering
Spring___________________________________________
10
Barker
Spring.._______________________________________________
10
Lifsey
Spring._________________________________________________
10
Taylor
Spring.________________________________________________
11
Summary
of
the
warm
springs_________--_-___-_______--__-_---_-
11
Cold
springs
of
the
region._-_-____--______________-----_---__-____-
11
Cold
Spring______________._____._________________ ._________
11
Trammel's
Spring.____________
________________________________
13
Blue
Spring___.__.__________________________________
13
Cold
chalybeate
springs._______________________________________
13
Summary
of
the
cold
springs.___________________________________
14
Chemical
character
of
the
waters.__-______________________--__--_-_-
15
Gases
in
the
spring
waters._________________________________________
21
Other
hydrologic
investigations____________________________________
21
Rainfall__________________________________________________
22
Water
levels
in
wells.__________________________________________
23
Streams
______________________________________________________
23
Rock
formations___-___---_-_.___-_________-_-__-____-__-____-_-_
25
Pre-Cambrian
rocks
north
of
Towaliga
fault
______________________
26
Carolina
gneiss____________________________________________
26
Snelson
granite_______---_______-_-_
v
---_____-_____-____--_
26
Pre-Cambrian
rocks
south
of
Towaliga
fault______________________
27
Sparks
schist_____________________________________________
27
Hollis
quartzite.__________
_______________________________
27
Manchester
schist________--______-______------_--------__-
29
Woodland
gneiss_______________-___--____--__-_-_---_-_-__
29
Cunningham
granite.______________________________________
30
Triassic
igneous
rocks.-_-_-_-_-_________-_-___-__--_-_-_--_---_
30
Tertiary
(?)
and
later
sedimentary
rocks_________-___-____-_-__-
30
Structural
features_________________________________________________
31
Source
of
the
Warm
Springs
water_________________________________
32
Source
of
the
heat
of
Warm
Springs
water.__________--__-__----_--__-
34
Source
of
the
Cold
Spring
water___________________________________
35
Measures
for
improving
the
Warm
Springs
___________________________
36
Index._________________________________________________________
39
in
ILLUSTKATIONS
PLATE
1.
Geologic
map
of
Warm
Springs
quadrangle,
Ga_-__
____
In
pocket
2.
Generalized
geologic
map
of
west-central
Georgia
and
east-
central
Alabama,
showing
location
of
Warm
Springs
quad-
rangle
and
principal
springs.
_____________________________
4
3.
Map
of
the
Warm
Springs
area
showing
sources
of
warm
water,
pools,
drains,
and
improvements.________
______________
4
4.
Relation
of
discharge
of
Warm
Springs
to
rainfall
and
ground-
water
level
at
Roosevelt
farm,
January
1,
1934,
to
June
30,
1935________________________________
12
5.
Weekly
average
discharge
of
North
Spring
and
weekly
rainfall
at
Roosevelt
farm_____
____________________________________
12
6.
Fluctuations
of
ground-water
level
in
four
wells
and
relation
to
rainfall,
eastern
part
of
Pine
Mountain
area_
____.___.__.___
20
7.
Outline
map
of
Pine
Mountain
drainage
basins
showing
stream
discharge
March
12,13,14,
23,1934_
_______________
24
8.
Outline
map
of
Pine
Mountain
drainage
basins
showing
average
stream
discharge
July
1,1934,
to
June
30,1935_
________
24
FIGUBE
1.
Cross
section
through
Pine
Mountain
and
Warm
Springs
showing
geologic
structure
and
probable
course
of
the
water
discharged
at
Warm
Springs_______._____-____--_____-_______-_-._
33
IV
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
THEIR
GEOLOGIC
RELATIONS
AND
ORIGIN A
SUMMARY
REPORT
By
D.
F.
HEWETT
and
G.
W.
CBICKMAY
ABSTRACT
Seven
groups
of
warm
springs
are
known
in
Georgia,
but
popular
interest
centers
in
Warm
Springs,
in
the
western
central
part
of
the
State,
which
is
improved
for
use
in
the
Georgia
Warm
Springs
Foundation.
A
geologic
study
shows
that
the
several
warm
springs
are
confined
to
a
belt
of
pre-Cambrian
metamorphic
rocks
and
that
their
general
distribution
is
determined
by
one
of
the
members,
the
Hollis
quartzite.
,A
hydrologic
study
that
extended
over
about
21
months
included
observations
on
rainfall,
water
levels
in
wells,
spring
and
stream
dis-
charge
from
an
area
of
32
square
miles,
and
chemical
character
and
temperature
of
the
water. The
data
show
that
the
water
of
Warm
Springs
is
that
which
falls
on
the
crest
of
Pine
Mountain
and
is
carried
in
the
Hollis
quartzite
to
a
depth
of
about
3,000
feet
so
that
it
absorbs
heat
from
the
rocks
and
is
delivered
at
the
surface
with
a
temperature
of
88°
F.
INTRODUCTION
Long
before
the
War
between
the
States, Warm
Springs,
Ga.,
was
a
health
and
bathing
resort
for
the
people
of
the
region.
In
recent
years,
and
especially
since
the
establishment
in
1926
of
the
Georgia
Warm
Springs
Foundation
for
the
treatment
of
victims
of
infantile
paralysis,
with
the
improvement
of
the
springs
and
the
erection
of
adequate
buildings,
interest
in
the
area
has
greatly
broadened.
The
group
of
springs,
some
of
them
warm,
along
the
north
base
of
Pine
Mountain
have
long
been
recognized
as
presenting
interesting
geologic
problems
worthy
of
study.
Why
are
these
springs
found
where
they
are?
Why
are
some
warm
and
others
cold?
What
is
the
source
of
the
warm
water?
Is
all
or
a
part
of
it
derived
from
great
depths,
possibly
from
the
same
sources
as
igneous
rocks,
or
is
all
or
a
part
of
it
water
that
has
fallen
as
rain
on
the
surface?
By
what
channels
does
it
rise
to
the
point
of
outlet?
What
improvements
might
be
made
to
conserve
the
warm
water
and
to
maintain
or
increase
its
temperature?
These
are
questions
that
require
geologic
research
for
their
solution.
Funds
allotted by
the
Public
Works
Administration
in
1933
enabled
the
Geological
Survey
to
undertake
a
study
of
these
problems.
I
2
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF GEORGIA
SCOPE
OF
THE
INVESTIGATION
The
program
included
a
geologic
reconnaissance
of
a
large
part
of
the
region,
the
making
of
a
geologic
map
of
the
Warm
Springs
quad-
rangle
(pi.
1)
for
which
a
new
topographic
base
map
was
prepared,
and
a
detailed
study
of
the
geologic
features
of
the
part
of
Pine
Mountain
that
lies
near
Warm
Springs.
Inits.&y
;
eb^logic^f*eote
the
investiga-
tion
included
a
study
of
the
distribution,
environment,
discharge,
chemical
character,
and
temperature
of
the
spring
waters-of
tkeregpsm;
also,
because
of
their
bearing
on
the
probable
source
of
the
spring
waters,
measurements
of
the
local
rainfall
and
of
water
levels
in
select-
ed
wells,
and
determinations
of
the
distribution
of
the
run-off
of
the
streams
from
an
area
of
32
square
miles
on
Pine
Mountain near
Warm
Springs.
Field
studies
in
the
region
extended
from
October
1,
1933,
to
June
30,
1935.
This
report
presents
in
brief
form
the
essential
data
and
outstanding
conclusions
of
each
phase
of
the
investigation.
Inasmuch
as
interest
centers
on
the
springs,
only
such
geologic
data
as
are
necessary
to
their
study
are
presented
here.
A
complete
report
is
in
preparation.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
In
a
full
sense,
this
was
a
cooperative
investigation.
The
Georgia
Department
of
Forestry
and
Geological
Development
cooperated
with
the
Geological
Survey,
of
the
United
States
Department
of
the
Interior,
in
the
broad
plan
and
in
the
study
of
the
geologic
features
of
the
region.
O.
E.
Meinzer,
W.
D.
Collins, L.
K.
Wenzel,
and
other
members
of
the
water-resources
branch
of
the
Federal
Survey
cooper-
ated
in the
planning
and
execution
of
the
field
and
laboratory
work.
W.
L.
Lamar,
also
of
the
Federal
Survey,
collected
numerous
samples
of
water
and
made
all
water
analyses.
Analyses
of
the
gases
were
made
by
W.
P.
Yant,
of
the
Bureau
of
Mines.
The
equipment
for
measuring
rainfall
and
stream
and
spring
discharge
was
installed
by
C.
E.
McCashin
and
D. H.
Barker,
resident
engineers
in
the
Mont-
gomery
office
of
the
Geological
Survey.
From
March
to
September
1934
L.
D.
Cannon,
of
the
Georgia
Warm
Springs
Foundation,
made
observations
on
rainfall,
water
levels
in
wells,
and
spring
discharge.
From
September
1934
to
June
30,
1935,
D.
E.
Booth,
engineer, was
employed
to
make
all
local
observations
and
measurements.
C.
E.
Van
Orstrand,
of
the
Geological
Survey,
gave advice
concerning
the
method
of
measuring
earth
temperatures
and
supplied
the equipment
used
for
that
purpose.
SURFACE
FEATURES
Most
of
the
Warm
Springs
quadrangle
is
a
gently
rolling
upland,
known
as
the
Greenville
Plateau,
above
which rise
two
persistent
ridges,
Pine
and
Oak
Mountains,
and
into
which
the
streams
have
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
THE
REGION
3
carved
small
open
valleys.
The
entire
area
lies
within
the
broad,
relatively flat
belt
of
central
Georgia
known
as
the
Central
Upland,
a
local
subdivision
of
the
Piedmont
province.
South
of
it
lies
the
lower,
flat
Coastal
Plain
region
that
makes
up
the
south
half
of
the
State,
and
to
the
north
lies
a
mountainous
region
that
comprises
parts
of
th©^Lookout
Plateau,
the
Valley
and
Ridge
province,
and
the
Appalachian
Highlands.
1
In
the
vicinity
of
Warm
Springs
the
rolling
upland
lies
at
an
altitude
of
760
to
980
feet.
Above
it
Pine
Mountain
rises
to
altitudes
that
range
generally
from
1,100
to
1,200
feet,
but
at
Dowdell
Knob
it
attains
the
maximum
of
1,395
feet.
In
this
region
Pine
Mountain
departs
from
the
simple
linear
ridge
that
is
characteristic
of
most
of
its
length
in
western
Georgia.
South
of
Warm
Springs
it
broadens
to
a
flat-topped
mountain
3
miles
wide,
and eastward
the
ridge
joins
a
peculiar
circular
ridge
that
encloses
the
depression
locally
known
as
the
Cove.
Near
the
southern
border
of
the
Warm
Springs
quad-
rangle
is
Oak
Mountain,
a
linear
ridge
that
largely
ranges in
altitude
from
900
to
1,100
feet
and
therefore
rises
several
hundred
feet
above
'the-adj&ee&t
plateau.
The
dominant
streams
of
west-central
Georgia
are
the
Flint
and
Chattahoochee
Rivers,
both
of
which
flow
generally
southward.
The
Flint
River
lies
within
the
eastern border
of
the
Warm
Springs
quadrangle,
and
many
of
the
minor
streams
of
this
region
drain
east-
ward
and
southeastward
to
it.
The
Chattahoochee
River
lies
beyond
the
western
border
of
the
quadrangle,
and
several
streams
of
this
region
flow
westward
and
southwestward
to
it.
The
divide
between
the
streams
that
are
tributary
to
these
two
rivers
extends
northward
from
Warm
Springs.
In
its
primitive
state,
all
of
this
region
was
doubtless
covered
with
dense
forest,
mostly
oak
and
other
hardwoods
but
including
pine
of
/-several.
varieties.
At
present
about
two-thirds
of
the
-area
north
of
Pine
Mountain
has
been
cleared
and
is
under
cultivation. About
half
of
the
area
south
of
Pine
Mountain
has
been
cleared.
On
Pine
Mountain
the
lower
slopes
are
locally
cleared
and in
part
are
planted
with
orchards.
Most
of
the
marketable
timber
has
been
removed
from
the
forest areas
by
selective
cutting.
Although
the
rocks
under-
lying
the
upland
of
the
Greenville
Plateau
are
of
different
kinds,
the
residual
soils
have*
much
resemblance,
and
all
are susceptible
to
erosion
and
gullying,
with
the
result
that
large
areas
have
been
ren-
dered
unfit
for
further
cultivation.
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
THE
REGION
The,
known
«Wlfem;
springs
of
Georgia
are
found
in
a
belt
that
ex-
tends
from
Barnesville
southwestward
about
40
miles
to
Warm
Springs.
It
has
been
known
for
more
than
a
hundred
years
that
the
i
LaForge,
Laurence,
Physical
geography
of
Georgia: Oeorgia
Oeol.
Survey
Bull.
42,
pp.
77-80,
1925.
4
THE
WABM
SPRINGS
OP
GEORGIA
waters
of
some
of
these
springs
were
appreciably
warm,
and
when
the
present
investigation
was
undertaken
the
pools
produced
by
five
of
the
springs Warm
Springs,
Thundering
Spring,
Barker
Spring,
Lifsey
Spring,
and
Taylor
Spring
(pi.
2) had
been
used
from
time
to
time
for
either
swimming
or
bathing.
During
this
investigation
two
more
warm
springs
were
discovered,
Parkman
and
Brown's
Springs,
and
additional
sources
of
warm
water
were'
found
near
Thundering
Spring.
The
spring
having
the
highest
temperature,
Warm
Springs
(88°
F.),
has
also
the
largest
discharge
(594
to
678
gallons
a
minute), and
the
warm
spring
having
the
lowest
temperature,
Brown's
Spring
(69°
F.),
has
the
smallest
discharge
(15
to
30
gallons
a
minute).
According
to
the
records
of
the
United
States
Weather
Bureau,
the
average
air
temperature
at
West
Point,
28
miles
west
of
Warm
Springs,
is
63.3°
F.,
and
at
Talbotton,
17
miles
southeast,
64.1°
F.
The
aver-
age
temperature
of
the
water
in
36
wells
in
the
lowland
adjacent
to
the
Pine
Mountain
area
is
62.1°
F.
In
this
investigation
springs
whose
temperature
is
higher
than
66°
F.
have
been
classified
as
warm.
All
these
warm
springs,
as
well
as
several
large
cold
springs,
issue
in
the
Wacoochee
belt,
a
large
part
of
which
is
made
up
of
a
series
of
altered
sedimentary
rocks,
called
by
Galpin
3
the
Pine
Mountain
formation
(pi.
2).
This
series
extends
from
Barnesville
southwest-
ward
almost
to Notasulga,
Ala.,
a
distance
of
100
miles.
The
most
conspicuous
unit
of
the
series
is
a
formation
known
as
the
Hollis
quartzite,
usually
275
to
800
feet
thick
in
this
region.
In
the
part
of
the
belt
under
consideration
the
quartzite
underlies
a
group
of
extensive
but
poorly
defined
ridges
that
make
up
Pine
Mountain,
which
here
rises
200
to
500
feet
above
the
surrounding
upland.
All
the
warm
springs
issue
at
the
surface
in
the
upland
areas,
near
the
ridges.
All
except
Warm
Springs
rise
through
the
Manchester
schist,
which
overlies
the
quartzite,
or
through
local
alluvium.
Warm
Springs
(no.
1,
pi.
2). The
warm
springs
for
which
this
region
has
become
nationally
famous
issue
at
the
north
base
of
a
low
knoll
which
is
the
site
of
the
Georgia
Warm
Springs
Foundation.
They
are
half
a
mile
west
of
the
town
of
Warm
Springs,
where
the
Columbus
branch
of
the
Southern
Kailway
crosses
the
Atlanta,
Birmingham
&
Coast
Kailway,
which
extends
from
Brunswick,
Ga.,
to
Birmingham,
Ala.
The
population
of
the
town
of
Warm
Springs
is
about
300,
but
250
more
reside
at
the
Foundation. The
pools
and
bathhouses
used
for
therapeutic
treatments
are
adjacent
to
the
springs
(pi.
3),
but
the
other
buildings
x
of
the
institution
are
in
fc
grove
of
pine
and
oak
that
covers
the
knoll.
About
200
acres
of
land
that
includes
the
knoll
and
the
springs
is
owned
by
the
Georgia
Warm
Springs
Foundation,
an
incorporated
nonprofit
organization.
This
investigation
reveals
a
record
of
the
springs
as
early
as
1819,
when
they
were
improved
with
bathhouses
and
there
was
a
1
Galpin,
S.
L.,
Feldspar
and
mica deposits
of
Georgia:
Georgia
Geol.
Surrey
Boll.
30,
p.
74,1915.
GEOLOGICAL
SUBVEY
WATER-SUPPLY
PAPER
819
PLATE
3
84°
ndian
Springs
o
%,
O
THOMASTON
LIST
OF
SPRINGS
1.'Warm
Springs
6.Lifsey
Sprin
2.
Parkman
Spring
7.
Taylor
Sprin
3.
Brown's
Spring
8-Blue
Spring
4.
Thundering
Spring
9.
Trammels
Spring
5.
Barker
Spring
EXPLANATION
Chewacla
marble
Known
outcrop
of
Hollis
quartzite
GENERALIZED
GEOLOGIC
MAP
OF
WEST-CENTRAL
GEORGIA
AND
EAST-CENTRAL
ALABAMA,
SHOWING
LOCATION
OF
WARM
SPRINGS
QUADRANGLE (SHADED
AREA)
AND
PRINCIPAL
SPRINGS
(NUMBERED).
GEOLOGICAL
SURVEY
WATER-SUPPLY
PAPER
819
PLATS
3
EXPLANATION
«43
Point
of
measurement
of
discharge
and
temperature
Numbers
correspond
to
those
in
table
in
text
MAP
OF
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
AREA,
SHOWING
SOURCES
OF
WARM
WATER,
POOLS,
DRAINS,
AND
IMPROVEMENTS
Numbers
indicate
points
where
discharge
was
measured.
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
THE
REGION
$
liotel
nearby,
but
doubtless
they
were
in
use
long
before
that
time.
8
In
187
5
the
water
was
conveyed
by
an
open
ditch
to
six
uncovered
masonry
chambers,
each
10
by
10
feet, which
were
used
for
bathing.
These
masonry
chambers,
now
covered
with
concrete
roofs,
are
used
as
a
reservoir
from
which
the
water
is
distributed
to
the
places
of
use.
Plate
3
shows
the
known
sources
of
warm
water
and
the
build-
ings
that
have
been
erected
to
use
it.
The
main
sources
of
warm
water
lie
south
of
the
group
of
masonry
chambers,
but
minor
sources
are
found
as
much
as
250
feet
to
the
east
and
250
feet
to
the
west.
At
present
only
the
water
from
the
main
sources
is
under
control for
use.
From
December
14,
1933,
to
June
30, 1935,
the
discharge
under
control
ranged
from
594
to
678
gallons
a
minute
(pp.
7-9).
Measurements
of
,the
discharge
of
all
the
minor
sources
during
the
same
period
ranged
from
233
to
294
gallons
a
minute
(p. 9).
The
total
discharge
of
all
sources,
therefore,
ranged
from
844
to
914
gallons
a
minute.
Several
measurements
made
as
much
as
40
years
ago
indicated
a
discharge
of
666
to
1,890
gallons
a
minute,
but
when
the
place
and method
of
measurement
are
considered,
there
is
no
reason
for
thinking
that
the
total
discharge
from
all
sources
has
varied
greatly-^-probably
not
more
than
20
percent during
this
period.
The
main
source
of
the
supply
may
be
examined
in
a chamber
24
feet
long
and
4
feet
high
that
lies
south
of
the
eastern
group
of
three
masonry
chambers
(pi.
3).
Most
of
this
chamber
is
lined
with
loosely
laid
quartzite
blocks,
from
the
cracks
of
which
considerable
water
issues,
but
a
recess
in
the
wall
reveals
an
open
fissure
in
hard
quartzite
from
which
about
200
gallons
a
minute
is
flowing
almost
horizontally.
Some
water and
bubbles
of
gas
rise
from
the
sand
that
covers
the
bottom
of
the
eastern
two
chambers.
The
only
additional
water
that
enters
the
reservoir about
75
gallons
a
minute is
discharged
from
a
hole
in
the south
wall
of
the
westernmost
of
the
six
chambers,
but
the
conditions
behind
the
wall
are
not
known.
Precise
measurements
of
the
temperature
of
the
Warm
Springs
water
as
it
issues
from
the
ground
at
its
main
east and
west
sources
were
made
on
seven
different
days
in
1933,1934,
and
1935
by
using
a
platinum
resistance thermometer.
At
the
east
source
the
temperature
on
different
days
ranged
from
87.7°
to
88.2°
F., and
at
the
west
source
from
87.1°
to
87.5°
F.
On
the
same
day
the
temperature
at
the
east
source
was
found
to
be
0.6°
to
0.7°
F.
higher
than
the
west
source.
A
recording
thermometer
reading
to
single
degrees
was
*
White,
George,
Statistics
of
Georgia,
p.
424,1849;
Historical
collections
of
Georgia,
p.
550,1854.
Walton,
G.
E.,
Mineral
springs
of
the
United
States
and
Canada,
p.
810,1878.
Duggan,
J.
R.,
Mineral
springs
of
Georgia,
p.
53,1881.
Weed,
W.
H.,
Notes
on
certain
hot
springs
of
the
southern
United
States:
Geol.
Survey
Water-Supply
Paper
145,
pp.
187-189,
1905.
Hall,
B.
M.
and
M.
R.,
Water
resources
of
Georgia:
Geol.
Survey
Water-Supply
Paper
197,
p.
14,1907.
McCallie,
S.
W.,
Mineral
springs
of
Georgia,
p.
166,
Georgia
Geol.
Surrey,
1913.
Watson,
T.
L.,
Thermal
springs
of
the
southeast
Atlantic
States;
Jour,
Geology,
vol.
82,
pp.
380-382,1924.
,
15468 37
2
6
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
installed
in
the east
source
in
April
1934,
and
during
the
following
year
and
a
half
it
indicated
that
the
temperature
at
this
source
varied
less
than
1°
F.
The
locations
of
the
places
where
the
discharge
from
minor
sources
was
measured
are
shown
on
plate
3.
Doubtless
there
are
other
sources
in
this
area,
but
they
cannot
be
identified
now.
Stated
broadly,
warm
water
issues
from
numerous
sources
in
a
narrow
belt
about
500
feet
long
that
closely
follows
the
base
of
a
hill
of
quartzite
where
it
meets
a
local
plain
underlain
by
unconsolidated
alluvium.
Most
of
the
water,
about
550
gallons
a
minute,
is
discharged
from
the
middle
25
feet
of
this
belt,
and this
water
shows
the
highest
temperature.
During
the
investigation
the
temperature
of
this
water
ranged
from
87.6°
to
88.2°
F.
Progressively
outward,
both
east and
west,
from
this
middle
part,
the
discharge
of
the
separate
sources
was
lower
and
the
temperature
of
the
water
was
lower,
dropping
to
83°
F.
at
the
westernmost
source
and
to
79°
F.
at
the
easternmost
source.
In
order
to
understand
some
of
the
influences
that
affect
the
dis-
charge
of
Warm
Springs,
an
attempt
was
made
to
measure
it
every
day.
As
the
present
facilities
for
using
the
water
represent
the
suc-
cessive
additions
to
those
installed
many
years
ago
and
as
the
drafts
upon
the
discharge
are continuous,
measurement
proved
difficult.
After
careful
examination,
the
conclusion
was
reached
that
the
dis-
charge
could
be
measured
best
by
diverting
all
the
water
from
the
covered
reservoir
to
the
public
pool
and
measuring
accurately
the
time
required
to
raise
the
water
level
in
the
pool
a
definite
amount,
usually
0.8
foot.
The
beginning
and
end
of
each
measurement
were
determined
by
using
a
hook
gage
placed
in
a
stilling
well
at
the
north-
east
corner
of
the
pool
(pi.
3).
The
area
of
the
pool
was
determined
to
be
10,490
square
feet;
therefore
the
volume
of
water
usually
measured
was
8,392
cubic
feet,
or
62,776
gallons.
The
duration
of
the
tests
ranged
from
95
to
105
minutes,
but
it
was
necessary
to
control
con-
ditions
around
the
spring
for
nearly
3
hours
every
day.
At
least
two
influences
are
known
to
affect
the
rate
of
discharge
of
springs the
pressure
head,
under
which
the
water
appears
at
the
surface,
and the
atmospheric
pressure,
which
tends
to
resist
and
offset
the
pressure
head.
Early
in
the
investigation
it
was
shown
by
experi-
ment
that
the
water
of
Warm
Springs
rises
under
considerable
pressure.
To
determine
the
fluctuations
in
atmospheric
pressure,
a
recording
barograph
was
installed
and
maintained
from
October
1,
1934,
to
June
30,
1935.
Careful
comparison
of
this
barometric
record
with
that
of
the
spring
discharge
shows
that
changes
in
atmospheric
pressure
have
only
slight
effect
on
the
discharge,
thus
indicating
that
there
is
considerable
head
at
the
outlet.
The
following
table
gives
the
measurements
of
discharge
made
during
this
investigation.
1
SPRINGS
OF
THE
REGION
Flute
4
presents
the
graph
of
discharge
calculated
as
the
running
average
over
2
weeks
for
each
week
covered
by
the
investigation.
The
record
was
intermittent
through
the
spring
of
1934
but
was
regular
and
very
reliable
from
August
1,
1934,
to
June
30,
1935.
Measurements
of
discharge
of
Warm
Springs,
in
gallons
a
minute
Date
1933
Tlfln
14
Dec
15
Dec.
19..........
Dec
20
r»n«
9Q
nn«
in
1934
Jan.
11
Jan.
12
...
.
Jan.
17
...
Jan.
19
Jan.
22...-.. ..
Jan.
23
....
Feb.
9.
_
.
Mar.
15..
__
--
Mar.
16
Mar.
22 .
Mar,26
Mar.
27
.
Mar.
28
.
Mar.
30
.
Apr.
9
...............
Apr.
21..
_
.........
May
1-.
____
--..
May
16
____
..
May
17..
....
May
23.
...
-
July. .. ..
Aug.
6...
...
Aug.
8
-_-._
Aug.
10..
.....
.
Aug.
11..
.......
...
-.
Aug.
13-
...
Aug.
14..
...
--..
Aug.
15
-
Aug.
16..
...
-
Aug.
18..
......
...
Aug.
20.....
......
Aug.
21.
..!....
......
Aug.
22.
.............
Aug.
23.
...
....
.
Aug.
24
..............
Aug.
25..
...
.
Augr2T...
__
.......
Aug.
28.
.....
Aug.
29..
.
Aug.
30..-
...
..
Sept.
1...
.-
_
-.--
...
Sept.
4... ..
Daily
rate
623.7
626.
9
615.7
630.7
621. 4
614.8
620.2
636.2
618.4
623.6
628.7
628.7
615.7
fl91
9
628.7
618.8
621.6
614.8
615.7
617.2
618.4
631.8
619.4
613.6
619.9
COO
A
637.5
636.7
622.1
619.7
634.5
fiQO
A
622.4
620.4
632.4
623.6
633.4
639.
5
642.7
629.0
632.4
0)
650.5
650.5
662.6
642.7
645
0
651.8
649.1
663.3
652.8
644.6
667.2
651.0
670.4
651.0
678.6
656.6
653:2
630.1
663.0
653.2
632.4
636.7
Average
for
week
622.1
626.0
622.4
619
9
623.1
619.4
613.6
621.4
620.9
637.1
632.4
652.0
650.8
656.8
655.9
Running
average,
2
weeks
623.7
fi91
Q
fi9l
Q
623.1
619.4
613.6
fi9Q
Q
629.7
fi97
9
635.9
651.29
653.8
656.2
648.9
Date
1934
Sept.
5
Sept.
7...
...
.
Sept.
8
Sept.
11.
Sept.
12..
_____
..
Sept.
14.
_
...
.-
Spnt
1
Q
Sept.
20
_
.
_
.
Sept.
21
Sept.
24
Sept.
25.
____
-..-
Sept.
27.
Sept.
28...
_
.
__
-.
Sept.
29
Oct.
I....'
Oct.
2....
...........
Oct.
5....
....
...
...
.
Oct.
6....
Oct.
8...
Oct.
9
...
Oct.
10.......
.-
Get:
11.
___
.
..
.
Oct.
12..,
Oct.
13... -
Oct.
15
Oct.
16..
_____
..--
Oct.
17
Oct.
18......
Oct.
19
__
.
___
--
Oct.
20
__
-
__
..--
Oct.
22... . -
Oct.
23
Oct.
24
_
.
___
.....
Oct.
25...
Oct.
26...
Oct.
27
Oct.
29......
.....
....
Oct.
30
_
.
_____
..
Oct.
31......
.......
-
Nov.
1_
....
.
Nov.
2.
......
.
Nov.
3.
...
Nov.
8.
........
Nov.
13..
Nov.
16
Nov.
17.
Nov.
20..
....
Nov.
21.
Nov.
23..
Nov.
24....
Nov.
27.
Nov.
28.
Nov.
29
Dec.
3.....
..-
Dec.
5...
....
Daily
rate
636.7
606.7
607.2
602.3
621.4
627.8
617.5
599.0
621.6
615.7
623.1
618.8
631.8
622.0
620.2
619.2
614.8
611.2
612.6
619.3
610.3
606.3
609.0
614.4
607.2
606.3
612.6
607.2
612.2
612.2
614,0
612.2
613.6
606.3
609.5
908.1
609.9
607.2
608.6
605.9
605.3
fins
i
607.2
606.3
fiOA
3
600
1
604.5
605.3
609 9
604.5
602.3
606.3
614.8
611.7
612.6
619.0
628.7
616.3
620.2
606.0
618.1
612.2
618.0
615.6
610.8
617.1
618.0
612.2
Average
for
week
635.3
613.1
613.4
623.2
614.4
611.1
610.7
fido
Q
607.0
605.6
607.9
618.4
614.0
Running
average,
2
weeks
621.4
613.2
618.3
618.8
612.7
610.9
610.3
608.5
606.2
606.5
613.6
616.4
613.9
1
No
measurements;
leaks
in
main
pipe
stopped.
8
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
Measurements
of
discharge
of
Warm
Springy
in
gallons
a
minute
Continued
Date
1934
Dec.
6..
.............
Dec.
8.
_______
Dec.
10
..............
Dec.
11.
_____
...
Dec.
12.
_
..
__
...
Dec.
13...
_
.
___
Dec.
14.
_
.....
_
..
Dec.
IS.......
.......
Dec.
16
______
.
Dec.
17
..............
Dec.
18...
__
....
...
Dec.
19...
__
.......
Dec.
20
__
.
.........
Dec.
21
..............
Dec.
22........
__
.
Dec.
23.....
_
......
Dec.
24
______
.
Dec.
25
..............
Dec.
26...
_
........
Dec.
27
_____
....
Dec.
28...
_____
.
Dec.
29.
___
......
Dec.
30.
_______
Dec.
31..
_____
.
1935
Jan.
1................
Jan.
2.
...............
Jan.
3
__
. .
Jan.
4
__
.
_
.....
Jan.
5
................
Jan.
6
_
.
Jan.
7
............
Jan.
8
................
Jan.
9
___
.
.......
Jan.
10
_____
..
Jan.
11
__
....
.....
Jan.
12...............
Jan.
13...............
Jan.
14
_
...
...
Jan.
15
__
..
....
Jan.
16.
......
Jan.
17
...........
Jan.
18
...............
Jan.
19.
...........
Jan.
21.
_____
..
.
Jan.
22
_
...........
Jan.
23
_______
.
Jan.
24.
_
...........
Jan.
25..
.....
Jan.
26
.............
Jan.
27
...............
Jan.
28...............
Jan.
29...............
Jan.
30.... .....
Jan.
31
...............
Feb.
1.
..............
Feb.
2.
_
.
_
.......
Feb.
3.
.......
...
....
Feb.
5.. ...
Feb.
6
___
.........
Feb.
7..
.............
Feb.
8..
.............
Feb.
9...............
Feb.
10..
............
Feb.
11..........
....
Feb.
12
__
..........
Feb.
13...
__
......
Feb.
14.......
....
Feb.
15...
...
.
Feb.
16..
............
Feb.
17...... .....
Feb.
18-
...
......
Feb.
19..............
Feb.
20..
............
Feb.
21..............
Feb.
22........
__
.
Feb.
23.
__
..
_
....
Feb.
24..
............
Daily
rate
606.7
609.0
610.8
607.2
603.2
602.3
601.4
603.6
602.3
601.9
613.6
608.5
602.8
600.9
60S.
4
598.7
597.3
599.2
599.7
601.4
600.0
603.6
604.5
603.2
602.8
601.4
603.2
600.9
602.3
606.0
604.5
607.7
615.7
606.0
618.9
604.0
602.3
604.9
609.5
611.2
611.2
614.0
606.4
613.4
607.7
611.7
600.1
604.5
605.4
611.2
611.2
609.0
606.0
607.2
604.9
610.0
606.0
600.5
612.6
600.0
597.3
601.4
612.6
598.2
615.7
611.7
607.2
600.9
619.9
605.4
595.5
604.9
616.7
613.9
611.2
605.4
607.2
600.0
Average
for
week
613.9
605.8
fifU
B
600.2
CAO
0
608.7
608.1
607.3
607.8
604 4
606.8
609.6
Running
average,
2
weeks
609.8
605.3
602.5
601.5
605.8
608.4
607.8
607.6
(VIA
^
605.7
AnQ
O
AAQ
9
Date
1935
Feb.
25.
__
....
__
.
Feb.
26.
__
.........
Feb.
27
__
...
__
..
Feb.
28
__
..........
TV/Tan
1
TV/Tar
9
TWai-
9
TV/Tar
19
Mar.
14........
......
IVtar
19
IVtar
21
IV/Tar
OO
Mar.
23.
............
IVIsr
27
IVtar
29
TV/Tar
Qft
Apr.
1
____
.......
Apr.
2.......
.'.......
Apr.
4..
...
ATM*
H
A
rvr
ft
Apr.
10.
_
...
_
....
Apr.
11..........
....
Apr.
12..... . .-
Apr.
13.....
.
..
Apr.
15.......
.......
Apr.
16....
_
.....
Apr.
17.
__
....
Apr.
20-.. ..
Apr.
22...
__
.......
Apr.
23.
_
.
_
-
_
.
Apr.
24...
__
Apr.26
....
.
Apr.
27..
__
.
_
.
1WQT7
Q
TVTATT
1^
TVfo-tr
1
A
May
15.....
.....
May
16.
__
May
17.
____
....
.
TVT*nr
Ifi
TX^ftTr
9*>
May
23
__
.....
__
May2A.
__
May
27
_
... ...
May
28
___
.......
May
30
____
.......
May
31
__
...
....
DaUy
rate
616.2
616.2
610.8
607.2
594.2
firu
n
609.7
627.4
R1Q
Q
619.5
624.7
625.2
ftlQ
Q
617.2
611.7
619.5
625.6
627.0
632.4
632.8
625.6
630.1
R1Q
O
624.7
626.5
R1Q
O
617.1
626.0
626.9
632.4
628.7
626.9
653.4
640.0
630.1
629.7
626.5
622.4
620.7
622.5
625.1
624.6
625.6
627.8
630.2
632.6
635.2
638.8
635.2
625.6
619.7
626:.
9
626.6
629.4
631.8
610.0
614.0
R1Q
O
631.4
629.3
635.7
625.6
AK1
1
fsAn
«
633.5
621.6
Average
for
week
622.5
619.4
AOA
1
620.7
622.0
627.3
635.9
624.1
625.5
635.5
Running
average,
2
weeks
607.7
620.2
Aon
o
622.5
623.4
621.4
624.4
629.4
627.6
628.2
630.5
628.0
WABM
SPRINGS
OF
THE
REGION
9
Measurement
of
discharge
of
Warm
Springs,
in
gallons
a
minute
Continued
Date
1935
June
1
...............
June
10
..............
Daily
rate
616.6
616.2
618.4
614.8
612.6
616.6
609.5
612.6
609.0
610.8
Average
for
week
617.7
612.0
Running
average,
2
weeks
614.8
610.5
Date
1935
June
22
_
.
..........
June
28. .
......
Daily
rate
609.0
610.3
604.1
608.1
606.3
607.7
606.3
603.2
614.0
Average
for
week
608.5
606.8
608.6
Running
average,
2
weeks
608.0
607.4
Measurements
of
discharge
of
Warm
Springs
and
surface
drains
No.
on
plate
3
32
1..__....._....
...........
38
1
.......................
34
».
35....
___
....................
36 ...
__
....................
37 ..
__
..
38.
__
..
39
__
...
.......
..... .....
40
41
__
..
____
...
-
_____
..
42
______
.
_
.
____
.
Total
(no.
42
minus
no.
35).-
43.
....................
44
. . . .
45.
______________
....
46.
_____________
.
......
47
48
__
-...
49
__
._ _ .
50 .
Total
(no.
50
minus
no.
43)
~
Total
discharge
of
warm
water,
not
including
Warm
61
»
___
....
...........
Tem-
pera-
ture
Oct.
17-21,
1934
(°F.)
65
65
65
65
82
84
86
79
86
86
80
62
83
73
79
85
87
46
81
85
Discharge
(gallons
a
minute)
1934
Oct.
17-21
12.1
6.3
24.2
14.4
34.6
39.9
13.5
4.5
31.4
20.2
85.8
71.4
32.8
24.2
85.8
3.1
1.1
54.8
1.1
194.4
161.6
233.0
Nov.
18
10.8
76.8
66.0
1.7
194.0
192.3
258.3
Dec.
8
12.1
6.3
26.5
16.6
88.0
71.4
16.6
227.0
210.4
281.8
1935
Jan.
5-6
18.8
8.1
26.9
16.6
90.2
73.6
30.1
244.0
213.9
287.5
Jan.
26,27
20.2
7.2
20.2
14.4
83.5
69.1
2.2
220.0
217.8
286.9
Feb.
9
15.7
7.2
11.3
15.7
83.5
67.8
Feb.
23
22.0
5.8
18.8
15.7
89.9
74.2
15.7
235.0
219.3
293.5
Mar.
23
62.9
9.9
33.2
14.4
81.7
67.3
0
221.0
221.0
288.3
35
Apr.
30
49.8
12.1
37.3
14.4
85.8
71.4
0
184.0
184.0
255.4
May
30
9.0
3.1
28.3
14.4
69.1
54.7
13.5
210.0
196.5
251.2
i Minor
cold
streams
east
of
area
shown
on
plate
3.
'
Spring
51
could
be
measured
only
when
the
water
of
the
pond
was
drained.
Parkman
Spring
(no.
2,
pi.
2). Parkman
Spring
was
identified
in
December
1933,
within
the
present
area
of
Parkman's
pond
at
a
time
when
it
was
drained
to
a
low
level.
The
pond
is
created
by
a
dam
below
the
junction
of
two
broad
valleys
that
drain
the
eastern
slope
of
a
spur
from
Pine
Mountain.
The
discharge
was
estimated
to
be
between
50
and
100
gallons
a
minute,
and
the
temperature
of
the
main
source
on
December
10,
1933,
was
76.6°
F.
An
analysis
of
the
water
appears
in
the
table
on
page
17.
10
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
Brown's
Spring
(no.
3,
pi.
2). Brown's
Spring
is
about
4
miles
northeast
of
Manchester,
in
the
low
ground
south
of
the
ridge
that
encloses
the
Cove.
Three
distinct
sources
of
water
appear
within
an
area
about
100
feet
in
diameter,
but
most
of
the
water
issues
from
the
southwest
source,
a
pool
about
5
feet
across.
A
little
gas
issues
from
this
pool.
Quarterly
measurements
from
December
1933
to
Decem-
ber
1934
indicate
that
the
discharge
ranges
from
15
to
30
gallons
a
minute.
The
temperature
of
the
main
source
was
69.0°
F.
on
Decem-
ber
8,
1933,
68.4°
F.
on
March
24,
1934,
and
68.1°
F.
on
June
14,
1935.
Two
analyses
appear
in
the
table
on
page
17.
Thundering
Spring
(no.
4,
pi.
2). Thundering
Spring
is
about
5
miles
southeast
of
Woodbury.
The
main
spring
rises
in
low
swampy
ground
on
the
north
slope
of
a ridge
and
was
once
surrounded
by
a
frame
enclosure,
so
that
the
pool
could
be
used
for
bathing.
The
principal
source
now
lies
in
the
center
of
a
dirty
pool
that
is
fed
by
a
surface
stream and
is
indicated
by
a vigorous
discharge
of
gas
bubbles,
from
which
the
name
was
derived.
During
the
investigation
the
water
of
the
surface
stream
proved
to
be
warmer
than
the
normal
for
the
region
and
to
contain
more
bicarbon-
ate
than
surface
water
generally.
This
led
to
the
discovery
of
four
other
sources
of
warm
water
in
a
triangular
area
1,000
feet
south
of
the
main
spring.
The
total
discharge
from
all
these
sources
in
June
1935
was
380
gallons
a
minute.
The
temperature
of
the
main
spring
was
74.2°
F.
on
March
23,
1934,
and
73.9°
F.
on
June
12,
1935.
Two
analyses
are
shown
in
the
table
on
page
17.
Barker
Spring
(no.
5,
pi.
2). Barker
Spring
is
south
of
State
High-
way
74,10
miles
southeast
of
Molena.
It
originally
issued
in
alluvium
in
the
low
ground
near
a
ridge
of
Hollis
quartzite,
but
it
is
now
en-
closed
by
concrete
walls
so
as
to
form
a
pool
28
by
98
feet,
which
is
used
for
swimming.
Numerous
sources
can
be
identified
by
the
gas
bub-
bles
that
rise
from
the
bottom.
In
November
1933
the
discharge
was
30
gallons
a
minute. The
temperature
in
the
largest
source was
73.4°
F.
on
March
23,
1934,
and
74.2°
F.
on
June
12,
1935.
Two
analyses
are
shown
in
the
table
on
page
17.
Li/sey
Spring
(no.
6,
pi.
2). Lifsey
Spring
issues
from
alluvium
in
low
ground
200
feet
north
of
a
county
road
that
extends
westward
2
miles
from
Pine
Mountain
Store,
4
miles
south
of
Zebulon.
Numerous
sources
of
water
are
enclosed
within
concrete
walls
so
as
to
form
a
pool
32
by
98
feet,
which
is
used
for
swimming.
Bubbles
of
gas
rise
spasmodically
from
the
largest
sources.
Measurements
in
June
1935
showed
a
total
discharge
of
83
gallons
a
minute.
The
temperature
on
June
15,
1935,
measured
by
placing
the
thermometer
bulb
on
the
bottom
of
the
pool
at
places
where
the
water
was
clear,
was
found
to
be
78.5°
F.
The
air
temperature
at
the
time
was
84°
F.,
and
the
temperature
of
the
water
at
the
surface
of
the
pool
was
78.8°
F.
An
analysis
of
the
water
appears
in
the table
on
page
17.
COLD
SPRINGS
OF
THE
REGION
H
Taylor
Spring
(no.
7,
pi.
2). Taylor
Spring
rises
in
the
alluvium
of
a
wide
valley
900
feet
west
of
U.
S.
Highway
19,
6.5
miles
south
of
Zebulon.
The
course
of
the
stream
that
drains
the
valley
has
been
diverted
to
a
new
channel,
and
the
sources
of
water
have
been
enclosed
by
an
earth
embankment
so
as
to
form
a
pool
350
feet
long
and
100
feet
wide
at
the
lowest
end.
From
this
reservoir
water
is
drawn
to
a
con-
crete
pool
40
by
130
feet,
which
is
used
for
swimming.
In
June
1935
the
spring
discharge
was
385
gallons
a
minute.
The
temperature
of
the
water
issuing
from
the
springs
hi
the
upper
part
of
the
reservoir
was
74.8°
F.
on
June
15,1935.
An
analysis
of
the
water
appears
in
the
table
on
page
17.
Summary
of
the
warm
springs.
Although
this
investigation
was
focused
on
the
features
and
environment
of
Warm
Springs,
it
seemed
desirable
to
make
general
and
intermittent
observations
of
all
the
other
warm
springs
that
were
known
or could
be
found
in the
region.
There
may
be
unrecorded
small
springs
of
warm
water
in this
general
region,
but
it
is
believed
that
all
that
exist
in
the
Warm
Springs
quadrangle
have
been
found.
The
temperature
and
chemical
char-
acter
of
the
warm
waters
were
surprisingly
constant
during
the
period
of
study.
The
discharge
of
Warm
Springs
varies,
but
not
as
much
as
that
of
the
cold
springs
of
the
region;
the
maximum
discharge
was
only
14
percent
more
than
the
minimum.
Conditions
were
not
favorable
for
making
numerous
precise
measurements
of
discharge
of
the
other
warm
springs.
The
chemical
character
of
the
warm
waters
is
dis-
tinctive.
(See
p.
15.)
The
geologic
relations
of
the
warm
springs
are
discussed
on
pages
32-35.
COLD
SPRINGS
OF
THE
REGION
At
many
places
in
this
region
there
are springs
that
discharge several
gallons
a
minute
of
clear
cool
water.
These
are
commonly
found
on
the
lower
slopes
of
hills
and
ridges.
Such
springs
are
abundant
in
most
regions
where
the annual
rainfall
is
40
inches
or
more.
At
a
few
places
in
this
region,
however,
there
are
springs
that
discharge
several
hundred
gallons
a
minute
or
more
of
cool
water,
and
interest
is
at-
tached
to
their
origin.
Among
the
springs
that
discharge
only
a
few
gallons
a
minute,
there
are
some
that
deposit
hydrated
oxide
of
iron.
Analyses
show
that
the
water
from
such
springs
contains
much
more
iron
than
other
waters,
and
they
are
commonly
known
as
chalybeate
springs.
Cold
Spring.
Within
an
area
of
about
8
acres
about
a
mile
south-
east
of
Warm
Springs,
there
are
four
distinct
springs
which,
for
the
purposes
of
this
investigation,
have
been
called
Cold Spring,
North
Spring,
and
South
Springs
nos.
1
and
2.
The
assemblage
is
locally
known
as
Cold
Spring.
All
are
found
within
a
reservation
used
as
a
fish
hatchery
by the
United
States
Government.
This
investiga-
tion
indicates
that
any
influence
which
affects
the
discharge
of
Cold
12
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
Spring
also
affects
that
of
North
Spring
and
that
they are
closely
related.
The
South
Springs,
which
are
about
30
feet
apart,
are
700
feet
southeast
of
North
Spring;
They
seem
to
be
separate
outlets
of
the
same
source
of
water
but
are
not
closely
related
to
Cold
and
North
Springs.
Each
of
the
four
springs
is
enclosed
in
a
wall
of
concrete
or
masonry.
The
water
of
Cold
Spring
is
used
for
several
purposes.
A
part
is
drawn
to
four
rams
800
feet
to the
northwest,
which
pump
a
part
of
the
water
to
an
elevated
tank
that
supplies
the
town
of
Warm
Springs.
A
part
is
drawn
to
two
other
rams
which
supply
nearby
private
houses.
Of
the
remainder,
a
part
is
drawn
to
a
small
reservoir
known
as
the
rock
house,
at
the
fish
hatchery.
The
water
from
North
Spring
supplies
the
pools
of
the
hatchery;
that
of
the
South
Springs
is
used
by
local
residents.
The
unused
and
waste
water
from
all
these
sources
constitutes
the
principal
supply
of
Cold
Spring
Branch.
Inasmuch
as
the largest
cold
spring
of
this
region
(Cold
Spring)
lies
within
a
mile
of
the
largest
warm
spring
(Warm
Springs),
the
sources
of
their
waters
present
an
interesting
problem.
After a preliminary
inspection
of
the
area,
it
seemed
desirable
to
compare
the
discharge
of
Cold
Spring
with
the
local
rainfall
and
to
obtain
a
continuous
record
of
the
temperature
of
the
water.
The
nature
of
the
diversions
made
this
plan
impossible,
however,
and
in
the
face
of
obvious
disadvantages,
the
necessary
instruments
were
installed
in
a
new
concrete
pool
which
surrounds
North
Spring.
It
was
found
that
the
discharge
of
North
Spring
ranged
from
a
minimum
of
238
gallons
a
minute
early
in
March
1935
to
a
maximum
of
451
gallons
a
minute
on
March
24,
1934.
A
comparison
of
the
curve
of
discharge
with
that
of
local
rain-
fall
as
measured
at
the
Koosevelt
farm
on
Pine
Mountain
(pi.
5)
indicates
that
there
is
a
broad
similarity
in
the
succession
of
highs
and
lows
that
seems
to
be
seasonal.
For
most
of
the
period
of
observation
(December
1933
to
June
30,
1935)
there
seems
to
have
been
a
lag
of
2
or
3
weeks
before
heavy
rainfall
is
reflected in
a
corresponding
rise
in
the
rate
of
discharge
of
the
spring.
Precise
measurements
of
the
temperature
of
numerous
sources
in
the
Cold
Spring
pool
on
November
30,
1933,
showed
that
it
ranged
from
63.4°
to
65°
F.
The
observed
range
during
the
period
of
investiga-
tion
was
from
62.8°
to
65°
F.
At
North
Spring
there
was
no
varia-
tion
in
temperature
in the
pool
on
a single
visit,
and
the
range
through-
out
the
period
was
from
65.3°
to
66.1°
F.
The
combined
discharge
of
South
Springs
nos.
1
and
2
was
about
50
gallons
a
minute,
but
this
was
not
measured
accurately,
as
it
was
one
of
several
minor
contributions
to
Cold
Spring
Branch,
the
discharge
of
which
was
accurately
measured
32
times
during
the
investigation.
The
temperature
of
the
waters
from
the
South
Springs
ranged
from
63.4°
to
64.3°
F.
GEOLOGICAL
STTRVBT
660
WATER-SUPPLY
PAPER
819
PLATE
4
(O
650
0.3
IOZ640
£0.
630
OZ
OJ620
^Z
<£~
610
Q
600
UJ
UlUJ
°z
o:±
S^
^
\
/
1
\
\
\
\
/\
\
\
\
/
\
s,
V-
26
27
28
29
in
2°
HO
HZ
30
a
31
Week
4
'"825
I
8
1522
I
8
152229512
19
263
10
17
24
31
7
142128
5
12
19
26
2 9
1623306
1320274
H
18
25
I
8
15
II
29
6
13
ZO27
3
10
17
2431
7l42f.'Z67
1421284
II
18252
9
16233Q§
13
2027
ending
Jan.
Feb.
Mar.
Apr.
May
June
July
Aug.
Sept.
Oct.
Nov.
Dec.
Jan,
Feb. Mar.
Apr.
May
June
1934
1935
RELATION
OF
DISCHARGE
OF
WARM
SPRINGS
TO
RAINFALL
AND
GROUND-WATER
LEVEL
AT
ROOSEVELT
FARM,
JANUARY
1,
1934,
TO
JUNE
30,
1935
Altitude
of
rain
page,
about
1,310
feet?
at
top
of
well,
aboat
1^255
feet.
RAINFALL
ON
ROOSEVELT
FARM
IN
INCHES
DISCHARGE
OF
NORTH
SPRING
IN
GALLONS
PER
MINUTE
g
§
5
<s
'
a
8
'
5J
t>
"*?
z?
COLD
SPRINGS
OF
THE
REGION
13
The
discharge
of
Cold
Spring
Branch
was
measured
intermittently
during
the
first
year
and
weekly
during
the
last
6
months
of
this
in-
vestigation
at
a
point
about
1,500
feet
below
the
lowest
pond in
the
hatchery.
The
measured
discharge
ranged
from
1,282
to
1,822
gallons
a
minute,
and
the
average
was
1,546
gallons.
As
this
includes;
most
of
the
discharge
of
Cold,
North,
and
South
Springs
and
very
little
from
other
sources,
it
is
a
close
approximation
to
the
actual
dis-
charge
of
the
four
springs.
Analyses
of
the
water
from
Cold
Spring
and
North
Spring
appear-
in
the
table
on
page
17.
Trammel's
Spring.
Trammel's
Spring
(no.
9, pi.
2;
see
also pi.
7)
is
about
1,500
feet
southwest
of
Fount
Trammers
house,
west
of
the
Warm
Springs
quadrangle.
It
is
a
circular
pool
about
15
feet
in
diameter
and
2
to
3
feet
deep,
in
swampy
ground
near
the
top
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
that
forms
the
northern
slope
of
Pine
Mountain.
In
December
1933
the
temperature
of
the
water
was
62.2°
F.
and
the
discharge
was
estimated
at
100
gallons
a
minute.
Chemically
the
water
closely
resembles
that
of
Cold
Spring
(17).
Blue
Spring
(no.
8,
pi.
2). Blue
Spring
is
20
miles
southwest
of
Warm
Springs,
on
the
north
slope
of
a
low
ridge
that
forms
the south
side
of
Pine
Mountain.
The
spring
forms
a
nearly
circular
pool
about
25
by
30
feet,
which
occupies
a
recess
in the
quartzite
ridge,
half
sur-
rounded
by
vertical
walls
covered
with
laurel,
ferns,
and
ivy.
The
water
is
quite
clear,
so
that
the
bottom,
25
feet
below
the
surface,
is-
plainly
visible.
The
water
drains
northward
through
a
channel
cut
in
the
rock,
and
measurements
of
discharge
made
weekly
during
the
last
10
months
of
the
investigation
showed
a
range
from
282
gallons
a
minute
(June
13,
1934)
to
367
gallons
(Mar.
22,
1935).
Comparison
of
the
record
of
discharge
with
that
of
the
rainfall
at
West
Point,
15
miles
to
the
northwest,
indicates
that
the
discharge
responds
to
local
rainfall
with
a
lag
that
ranges
from
1
to
3
weeks.
The
temperature
of
the
water
was
64.5°
F.
on
December
8, 1933,
and
64.4°
F.
on
June
14,
1935.
Analyses
of
the
water
at
the
beginning
and
end
of
the
investigation
showed
almost
identical
composition.
The
total
solids,
bicarbonate,
and
silica
content
are
intermediate
between
those
in
most
of
the
cold-
spring
and
warm-spring
waters.
(See
table,
p.
17.)
Cold
chalybeate
springs. At
two localities
hi
the
Warm
Springs
quadrangle
(Chalybeate
and
Oak
Mountain) and
at
one
west
of
its
borders
(White
Sulphur)
iron-bearing
springs
have
been
improved
so
that
the
waters
may
be
used
for
bathing
and
other
purposes.
At
each
of
these
springs
a
hotel
and
cottages
were
maintained
for
many
years,
but
those
at
Chalybeate
were
removed
some
years
ago.
At
Chalybeate,
2
miles
east
of
Manchester,
four
springs
that
lie
in
a
belt
200
feet
long
have
been
improved.
The
waters
of
three
of
these
15458 37 3
14
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
show
high
total
solids
and
silica
and
appreciable
iron,
and
they
appear
to
be
almost
identical
chemically;
the
total
measured
discharge
has
ranged
from
12
to
24
gallons
a
minute. The
observed
temperature
ranged
from
65.0°
to
65.4°
F.
on
December
8,
1933,
and
from
64.6°
to
64.8°
F.
on
June
14,
1935.
The
fourth
spring,
at
the
east
end
of
the
belt,
yields
water
much
lower
in
total
solids
as
well
as
in
iron.
The
temperature
of
this
spring
was
61.9°
F.
on
December
8,
1933,
and
63.1°
F.
on
June
14,
1935.
Oak
Mountain
Spring
issues
in
a
ravine
on
the
south
slope
of
Oak
Mountain,
where
the
underlying
rocks
are
Manchester
schist.
The
measured
discharge
has
ranged
from
0.54
to
0.94
gallon
a
minute,
and
the
observed,
temperature
from
60°
to
64°
F.
Chemically
the
water
resembles
that
from
the
three
western
springs
at
Chalybeate.
(See
p.
17.)
At
White
Sulphur
Springs
four
sources
have
been
improved White
Sulphur,
Black
Sulphur, Red
Sulphur,
and Chalybeate.
These
springs
issue
in
an
area
of
low
ground
along
State
Highway
18
near
the
crossing
of
Sulphur
Creek,
7
miles
west
of
Warm
Springs.
The
underlying
rocks
are
a
part
of
the
Carolina
gneiss.
The
discharge
of
each
of
these
springs
is
small,
the
range
for
the
four
during
this
in-
vestigation
being from
0.65
to
1.62
gallons
a
minute.
The
tempera-
ture
of
the
water
of
three
of
the
springs
ranged
from
61.9°
F.
on
December
8,
1933,
to
63.1°
F.
on
June
14,
1935;
the
fourth
showed
slightly
higher
temperatures,
possibly
because
it
rises
under
a
dwelling.
Chemically
the
waters
resemble
those
at
Chalybeate.
(See
p.
17.)
Summary of
the
cold
springs.
This
investigation
indicates
that
springs
of
cold
water
that
yield
more
than
50
gallons
a
minute
are
very
rare
in
this
region;
on
the
other
hand,
there
are
many
small
springs
that
yield
1
to
10
gallons
a
minute.
The
high
discharge
of
the
group
of
springs
at
the
fish
hatchery
suggests
that
some
uncommon
circumstances
account
for
their
existence.
(See
pp.
35-36.)
The
improvements
around
the
three
groups
of
chalybeate
springs
give
the
impression
that
they
too
are
very
rare
in
the
region.
The
number
of
areas
where
cold
spring
waters
are
now
depositing
oxides
of
iron
and
the
presence
in
several
areas
of
bodies
of
iron
oxides
large enough
to
justify
mining
operations
indicate
that
chalybeate
springs
are
and
have
been
fairly
widespread.
Both
the
iron
and
the
sulphate
present
in
these springs
indicate
that
the
nearby
rocks
contain
small
amounts
of
disseminated
iron
sulphide,
probably
pyrite.
The
measurements
of
discharge
and
temperature
of
the
chalybeate
springs
indicate
that
they
respond
to
seasonal
rainfall:
the
discharge
is
greatest
and
the
water
temperature
lowest
in
the
late
spring,
after
the
cold
rains
of
late
winter,
and
the
discharge
is
smallest
and
the
water
temperature
highest
during
the
fall,
after
the
months
of
low
rainfall.
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
15
CHEMICAL
CHARACTER
OF
THE
WATERS
The
waters
of
the
Warm
Springs
region
show
distinct
differences
in
composition
that
correspond
to
differences
in
temperature.
This
is
evident
from
the
analyses
in
the
table
on
pages
17-18
and
from
th6
results
of
a
much
larger
number
of
tests
made
in
the
field.
Analyses
of
samples
taken
from
the
same
spring
at
different
tunes,
however,
show
no
appreciable
changes
in
composition.
The
warm
waters
of
the
region
are
characterized
by
their
content
of
calcium
and
magnesium
bicarbonates,
which,
as
carbonates,
make
up
68
percent
of
the
total
of
120
parts
per
million
of
dry
residue
obtained
by
evaporation
of
the
water.
Silica
makes
up
about
20
percent.
The
preponderance
of
calcium
and
magnesium
bicarbonates
and the
high
proportion
of
silica
set
off
the
warm
waters
as
distinctly
different
from
the
waters
in streams,
in
shallow
wells,
and in
most
of
the
cold
springs
of
the
region.
As
it
is
widely
believed
than
an
appreciable
amount
of
boric
acid
in
water
indicates
a
volcanic
origin,
many
samples
of
both
warm
and
cold
water
were
tested
for boron
by
a
method
which
will
detect
as
small
a
quantity
as
0.1
part
per
million.
None
of
the
samples
re-
sponded
to
the
test.
From
this
evidence
alone,
even
though
the
boron
content
of
the
waters
is
less
than
0.1
part
per
million,
it
is
conceivable
but
improbable
that
a
very
small
part
of
the
water
of
the
warm
springs
is
derived
from
a
volcanic
source.
Typical
cold
water
from
springs,
streams,
or
wells
in
the
Warm
Springs
area
is
characterized
by
its
exceedingly
low
content
of dis-
solved
mineral
matter
which
in
general
is
only
a
little
more
than
one-tenth
that
hi
the
warm
water.
Furthermore,
the
silica
in
the
cold
water
is
about
50
percent
of
the
total
dissolved
material,
although
its
actual
concentration in
parts
per
million
is
only
about
one-third
the
concentration
of
the
silica
in the
typical
warm
water.
The
fact
that
the
warm
waters
generally
contain
about
30
parts
per
million
of
calcium
and
magnesium
together,
whereas
most
of
the
samples
from
cold
springs,
streams, and
shallow
wells
examined
con-
tain
only
about
1
part
per
million,
suggests
that
the
warm
waters
have
had
a
very
different
history
from
most
of
the
cold
waters.
The
composition
of
the
water
from
one
cold
spring Blue
Spring
and
several
streams
suggests
that
it
is
the
normal
cold
water
of
the
region
to
which
has
been
added
a
portion
of
water
like
that
of
the
warm
springs.
On
the
other
hand,
three
springs
at
Chalybeate
and
four
springs
at
White
Sulphur,
the
Oak
Mountain
Spring,
and
the
well
of
the
Manchester
High
School
yield
water
that
is
intermediate
in
several
respects
but
in others
cannot
be
considered
a
mixture
of
typical
warm
and
cold
waters.
In
their
content
of
calcium,
magne-
sium,
and
bicarbonate
they
fall
between
the
typical
warm
and
cold
16
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
springs
but
are
nearer
the
warm
springs.
Their
sulphate
content,
however,
is
about
\%
to
2
times
the
sulphate
content
of
the
warm-
spring
waters
and
from
5
to
10
times
that
of
typical
cold-spring
waters.
Even
so,
the
sulphate
makes
up
only
about
10
percent
of
the
mineral
content
of
these
intermediate
waters.
The
calcium,
magnesium,
and
carbonate
account
for
more
of
the
residue
on
evapo-
ration
of
the
waters
than
all
the
other
constituents.
The
total
quan-
tity
of
dissolved
mineral
matter
in
these
intermediate
waters
is
about
the
same
as
is
found
in
the
warm
waters,
but
the
silica
content
is
nearly
double
that
of
the
warm-spring
waters,
both
in
parts
per
mil-
lion
and
as
percentages
of
the
dried
residue
on
evaporation.
Some
of
the
intermediate
waters
contain
much
more
iron
than
is
found
in
the
other
waters
of
the
area,
and
one,
White
Sulphur,
contains
hydrogen
sulphide.
It
seems
probable
that
the
history
of
these
intermediate
waters
must
be
different
from
the
history
of
the
typical
warm or
cold
waters
of
the
area.
The
accompanying
table
of
analyses
shows
the
amounts
of
constit-
uents
that
were
found
in
measurable
quantities
and
is
followed
by
brief
descriptions
of
the
sources
of
the
samples
analyzed.
All
the
samples
were
tested
for
carbonate,
and
none
was
found.
No
boric
acid
was
found
in
the
samples
tested
for
this
constituent.
A
few
of
the
samples
from
warm
springs
were
tested
for
manganese,
and
none
was
found.
The
table
does
not
give
the
results
of
these
tests
for
carbonate,
boric
acid,
and
manganese.
Analyses
of
spring,
stream,
and
wett waters
in
and
near
Warm
Springs,
Qa.
[Analyzed
by
W.
L.
Lamar,
except
no.
41.
Analyses
given
in
parts
per
million]
No.
1
2
3
4
4A
a
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
IS
14
15
16
17
is
19
9,0
91
22
WABM
SPEINGS
Warm
Springs:
Bast
source
........
... ...
Parkman
Spring
__________
Brown's
Spring
___________
ing
Spring
_____________
Barker
Spring
___________
Taylor
Spring
___________
COLD
SPEINGS
Blue
Spring
____________
Trammel's
Spring
___
.
_
.
_
Cold
Spring
__
......
..............
Chalybeate
Spring
No.
1.
_____
Chalybeate
Snrine
No.
3
__
-
Date
of
col-
lection
/Dec.
11,1933
\June
13,1935
/Dec.
11.1933
\June
13,1935
Dec.
10,1933
Dec.
8, 1933
June
14,1935
Apr.
2,
1934
June
12,1935
Apr.
2,
1934
June
12,1935
Mar.
23,
1934
June
12,1035
__
do
____
June
15,1935
/Deo.
8,1933
\June
14,1935
Dec.
9,1933
Dec.
10,1933
June
13,1935
Dec.
10,1933
Mar.
31,
1934
June
13,1935
Deo.
10,1933
June
13,1935
Dec.
8,1933
.. do .-..
.....
do
._.
Dec.
7,
1933
Dec.
8,1933
..
_
do
___
.
/Dec.
8,
1933
\June
14,1935
Dec.
8,1933
.
do
. .
Tem-
perature
(°F.)
88.0
O/.
/
87.4
O<*
A
76.6
69.0
74.2
/O.
V
72.6
71.9
73»4
1
9t
O
78.5
74.8
64.5
64.4
62.2
63.4-65.0
OO.
V-VTU
a
66.1
66.1
65.6
64.3
DO.
v
62.5
62.2
63.8
66.4
62.6
59.0
62.8
65.2
65.4
65.0
Total
dis-
solved
solids
121
J.A>
117
120
114
144
A*n
66
83
107
141
105
43
45
14
14
14
18
17
14
16
141
15
109
126
Silica
(SiOj)
23
21
24
21
25
*O
14
16
18
16
£iQ
30
20
12
14
7.6
7.3
/.
V
9.4
9.0
6.8
6.8
46
8.0
38
41
45
Iron
(Fe)
0.01
.01
.02
.01
.03
.03
.03
.03
.02
.02
.02
.01
.01
.01
.04
.01
.02
.02
.02
.01
.01
.02
.01
.02
.01
8.0
3.4
A.
O
Cal-
cium
(Oa)
21
41
20
20
19
27
At
9.9
10
14
W
L0
23
18
5,0
5.5
.2
.4
.5
.7
.6
.3
.7
17
.2
8.6
12
La
Mag-
nesium
(Mg)
12
L£
11
11
11
10
11
5.7
5.9
7.6
11
11
11
10
2.9
V
.3
.3
.4
.3
.4
3.2
.3
5.4
5.3
Sodi-
um
(Na)
1.6
1.7
2.6
2.8
. 1
2.1
.
o
2,4
2.4
.
O
7.4
2.9
2.1
H
1.1
1.0
1.4
1.4
1.5
JL*
a
16
1.5
8.3
8.5
o.
o
Potas-
sium
(K)
3.6
3.5
.
*
2.5
4.3
4.4
2.0
.
O
2.4
3.4
3.2
1.9
1.1
1.5
.5
.2
.4
.5
.7
.2
.4
2.0
.4
3.4
3.3
.
^
Bicar-
bonate
(HCOa)
118
114
115
111
144
±*O
61
84
82
114
137
111
31
o<£
3.0
2.0
4.0
3.5
4.4
3.0
u
100
97
96
96
2.0
2.0
58
81
oi
83
82
Sul-
phate
(SOO
7.3
/.
0
7.0
7.4
5.1
4.9
5.1
3.0
.
U
3
4.0
4,4
*
O
5.6
4.1
1.9
ifi
1.2
1.1
.7
1.4
.8
1.2
a
6.0
6
6
6
1.1
1
13
10
tf.
O
10
10
Chlo-
ride
(01)
1.8
1.8
2.0
1.8
1.8
O
2
1.8
1.5
1.8
1.6
1.8
U
1.6
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.4
1.5
1.4
1.5
2.1
2
2
2
1.8
2.4
1.8
1.9
2
2
Fluo-
ride
(F)
0.1
.1
.1
.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
.3
.0
.6
.1
.0
Ni-
trate
(NO,)
0.10
.15
.15
.15
.05
0
AA
0
.05
0
.05
0
0
.15
0
.05
AA
0
.05
AK
0
0
.06
.43
.
o*
0
.0
.05
.05
AQ
Total
hard-
ness
as
CaOOi
102
102
95
95
93
108
48
66
66
93
103
86
24
26
1.7
2.2
2
t
3.4
2.7
2.4
U
56
1.7
44
62
Kfi
Analyses
of
spring,
stream,
and
well
waters
in
and
near
Warm
Springs,
Oa.
Continued
No.
as
?4
?f>
36
w
w
29
30
31
33
38
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
COLD
SPRINGS
continued
Woodbury
Spring
No.
1
............
SURFACE
WATEES
Do
.--- .- '
Mountain
stream
(about
4
miles
south
of
Shiloh,
Ga.)_.
_
.
.......
Do....-
....
......
Manchester
reservoir..
.............
Mountain
stream
on
Pine
Mountain.
WELLS
Date
of
col-
lection
Dec.
8. 1933
Mar.
24,
1934
Apr.
2,
1934
.. do. ....
-..-do........
June
15,1935
..do
.....
Dec.
9,
1933
Dec.
7,
1933
Mar.
29,
1934
Dec.
9,
1933
Dec.
10,1933
Apr.
2,
1934
Dec.
11,1933
Mar.
28,
1934
July
23,1929
Tem-
perature
(°F.)
61.9
54.0
63.6
63.6
63.6
64.3
48
55
57
50
53
63
47
46
64
59.5
Total
dis-
solved
solids
18
16
15
19
so
23
37
15
23
33
103
Silica
(SiOj)
6.9
8.3
7.5
4.5
5.8
14
8.2
14
5.0
5.8
9.8
43
Iron
(Fe)
.01
.01
.02
.04
.02
.25
.20
.41
.06
1.7
.01
.25
Cal-
cium
(Oa)
.3
.5
2.1
.8
1.6
.3
1.5
.5
13
Mag-
nesium
(Mg)
.3
.4
.4
1.2
.6
.9
.3
1.4
1.3
2.5
Sodi-
um
(Na)
1.5
1.5
1.4
1.6
3.1
1.0
3.2
1.9
1.7
2.3
7.3
Potas-
sium
(K)
.5
.5
.6
.2
1.6
.4
1.1
.2
.5
3.2
Bicar-
bonate
(HC0
3
)
15
15
2
A
2.0
6.0
3.0
n
r\
3.0
17
3.0
14
29
2.0
11
31
4.0
2.0
59
Sul-
phate
(S0
4
)
2
2
2
C
1.6
1.8
1.8
1.6
1.6
2
1.6
1.4
2
2
1.8
4.1
Chlo-
ride
(01)
4
1
1.8
1
2.1
1.6
2.0
2.0
2.1
2
2.1
2.2
2
3.0
4.6
2
Fluo-
ride
(F)
.0
.0
.6
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
.0
Ni-
trate
(NOs)
.6
1.3
.28
.05
.22
.05
.05
.05
.07
.07
.06
.15
.05
.0
.18
6.8
Total
hard-
ness
as
CaCOj
2.0
2.0
2.9
9
n
2.9
10
4.5
7.7
2.0
9.5
6.6
43
00
CHEMICAL
CHARACTER
OF
THE
WATERS
}g
1.
Warm
Springs,
the
springs
for
which
the
town
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.,
is
named;
location
shown
on
plate
2;
owned
by
Warm
Springs
Foundation.
This
source
supplies
much
the
largest
quantity
of
water
of
all
the
warm
springs
in
the
region,
and
its
temperature
is
the
highest.
It
supplies
the
pool
used
in
the
treat-
ment
of
patients
at
the
Warm
Springs
Foundation.
2.
Parkman
Spring;
in
Parkman
Pond,
2.6
miles
southeast
of
Warm
Springs;
owned
by
W.
G.
Harry.
The
sample, collected
when
the
pond
was
drained
to
a
low
level,
probably
contained
some
surface
water,
because
a
stream
was
flowing
over
the
spring
outlet.
3.
Brown's
Spring;
4
miles
in
an
air
line
east-northeast
of
Manchester,
Ga.;
owned
by
Tom
Brown.
Water
issues
from
the
ground
at
three
distinct
sources;
the
sample
was
collected
from
the
source
having
the
largest
flow.
4.
Thundering
Spring;
in
a
small
pond
5.1
miles
in
an
air
line
east-southeast
of
Woodbury,
Ga.
The
sample
was
collected
directly
from
the
main
source
in
about
the
center
of
the
pond
but
may
contain
some
creek
water,
as
the
pond
is
also
fed
by
a
creek.
4A.
Small
spring
tributary
to
Thundering
Spring;
5.2
miles
in
an
air
line
east-
southeast
of
Woodbury,
Ga.
5.
Barker
Spring;
on
State
Highway
74,
about
7
miles
west-northwest
of
Thomaston,
Ga.;
owned by
Barker
estate. The
spring
issues
in
a
swimming
pool.
6.
Lifsey
Spring;
about
5
miles
south
of
Zebulon,
Ga.;
owned
by
John
Mangham.
The
spring
issues
in
a
swimming
pool
200
feet
north
of
a
county
road
that
extends
westward
from
Pine
Mountain
Store,
on
U.
S.
Highway
19.
7.
Taylor
Spring;
6.5
miles
south
of
Zebulon,
on
U.
S.
Highway
19;
owned
by
R.
G.
Gibson.
The
sample
was
collected
at
the
swimming-pool
intake,
at
the
lower
end
of
the
reservoir
fed
by
the
spring.
8.
Blue
Spring;
about
5
miles
west-southwest
of
Hamilton,
Ga.;
owned
by
C.
J.
Galloway.
The
spring
forms
a
deep
pool.
9.
Trammers
Spring;
6.1
miles
in
an
air
line
west-southwest
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
Fount
Trammel.
10.
Cold
Spring;
Warm
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
U.
S.
fish
hatchery.
The
spring
issues
in
a
covered
reservoir
on
State
Highway
41.
Source
of
public
supply
for
town
of
Warm
Springs.
11.
North
Spring;
Warm
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
U.
S.
fish
hatchery.
The
spring
issues
in
an
open
reservoir
on
State
Highway
41.
12.
South
Spring
No.
1;
on
State
Highway
41,
Warm
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
U.
S.
fish
hatchery.
13.
White
Sulphur
Spring;
White
Sulphur
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
Mrs.
N.
E,
Goodman.
The
spring
is
covered
and
discharges
from
a
pipe
into
a
small
pool.
14.
Black
Sulphur
Spring;
White
Sulphur
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
Mrs.
N.
E.
Goodman.
15.
Red Sulphur
Spring;
White
Sulphur
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
Mrs.
N.
E.
Goodman.
16.
Chalybeate
Spring;
in
a
roadside
store
at
White
Sulphur
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
Mrs.
N.
E.
Goodman.
17.
Kings
Gap
Spring;
8.2
miles
in
an
air
line
west-southwest
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.
The
spring
issues
in
a
covered
reservoir;
source
of
public
supply
for
Chip-
ley,
Ga.
18.
Pine
Mountain
Spring;
on
U.
S.
Highway
27,
Hog
Gap,
Ga.
19.
Oak
Mountain
Spring;
about
4
miles
south
of
Shiloh,
Ga.
The
spring
is
covered
and
discharges
through
a
pipe.
20.
Chalybeate
Spring
No.
1;
Chalybeate
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
W.
A.
Reeves.
20
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
21.
Chalybeate
Spring
No.
2;
Chalybeate
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
W.
A.
Reeves.
22.
Chalybeate
Spring
No.
3;
Chalybeate
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
W.
A.
Reeves.
23.
Chalybeate
Spring
No.
4;
Chalybeate
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
W.
A.
Reeves.
24.
Small
spring;
4
miles
in
an
air
line
east-northeast
of
Manchester,
Ga.;
owned
by
Tom
Brown.
This
spring
is
close
to
Brown's
Spring
(no.
3).
25.
Gill
Spring;
3
miles
in
an
air
line
south
of
Woodbury,
Ga.;
owned
by
W.
R.
Gill.
The
sample
was collected
from
the
largest
of
three
separate
springs.
26.
Woodbury Spring
No.
1;
the
larger
of
two
springs
2.9
miles
in
an
air
line
south
of
Woodbury,
Ga.;
owned
by
town
of
Woodbury.
Source
of
public
supply
for
Woodbury.
27.
Woodbury
Spring
No.
2;
the
smaller
of
two
springs
2.9
miles
in
an
air
line
south
of
Woodbury,
Ga.;
owned
by
town
of
Woodbury.
28.
Willingham
Spring
No.
1;
about
7.5
miles
northwest
of
Thomaston,
Ga.;
owned
by
W.
F.
Ellerbee.
One
of
three
springs
made
up
of
numerous
small
seeps.
The
sample
was
collected
from
the
spring
east
of
the
other
two.
29.
Cascade
Branch;
1.5
miles
in
an
air
line
southwest
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.
Sample
collected
at
road
crossing.
30.
Mount
Hope
Branch;
2.4
miles
in
an
air
line
west-southwest
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.
Sample
collected
at
road
crossing.
31.
Mountain
stream
on
Pine
Mountain;
8.2
miles
on
an
air
line
southwest
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.
Sample
collected
at
Shiloh-Chipley
road
crossing.
32.
Mountain
stream
on
Pine
Mountain;
6.3
miles
in
an
air
line
southwest
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.
Sample
collected
from
west
branch
just
above
confluence
with
east
branch
at
Shiloh-Chipley
road
crossing.
33.
Sparks
Creek;
4.5
miles
in
an air
line
south-southwest
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.
Sample
collected
from
east
branch
just
above
confluence
with
west
branch
at
Shiloh-Chipley
road
crossing.
34.
Mountain
stream;
about
4
miles
south
of
Shiloh,
Ga.
Sample
collected
near
the
swimming
pool
in
the
Oak
Mountain
Spring
resort.
35.
Mountain
stream;
about
4
miles
south
of
Shiloh,
Ga.
Sample
collected
in
the
Oak
Mountain
Spring
resort
at
a
point
about
150
feet
upstream
from
Oak
Mountain
Spring.
36.
Manchester
reservoir;
2.7
miles
in
an air
line
south
of
Warm
Springs, Ga.
Source
of
public
supply
for
Manchester,
Ga.
Sample
collected
from
reservoir
on
headwaters
of
Pigeon
Creek
above
Cooler
Branch.
37.
Mountain
stream
on
Pine
Mountain;
2.6
miles
in
an
air
line
southeast
of
Warm
Springs,
Ga.
The
stream enters
Parkman
Pond
from
the
northwest.
Sample
collected
just
above
Parkman
Pond
and
above
Parkman
Spring
(no.
2),
which
is
located
in
the
pond.
The
sample
collected
from
Parkman
Spring
prob-
ably
contained
some
of
this
surface water.
38.
Mountain
stream;
5.2
miles
in
an
air
line
east-southeast
of
Woodbury,
Ga.
This
stream
is
tributary
to Thundering
Spring.
Sample
collected
about
50
feet
below
the
confluence
of
two
small
streams
and
above
all
sources
of
warm
water.
Warm
waters
from
springs
enter
this
stream
below
the
point
at
which
this
sample
was
collected.
39.
Well
27
feet
deep;
Warm
Springs,
Ga.;
owned
by
J.
E.
Mathis.
40.
Well
35
feet
deep;
2
miles
in
an
air
line
east-northeast
of
Shiloh,
Ga.;
owned
by
E.
A.
Fuller.
41.
Well
530
feet
deep,
drilled
in!928;
on
the
Manchester
High
School
grounds
on
State
Highway
41,
Manchester, Ga.;
owned
by
city
of
Manchester.
The
well
is
used
as
an
emergency
source
for
the
Manchester
public
supply.
(See
no.
36.)
Analysis
furnished
by
the
city
commissioners
of
Manchester.
OTHER'
HYDR0LOGIC
INVESTIGATIONS
GA3E3
IN
THE
SPRING
WATERS
21
Small
quantities
of
gas
rise
from
most
of
the
springs
of
the
region,
both
warm
and
cold.
Duplicate
samples
for
analysis
were
collected
rfrom
Warm,
Thundering,
Cold,
and
North
Springs.
The
analyses,
made
by
W.
P.
Yant,
of
the Bureau
of
Mines
at
Pittsburgh,
Pa.,
are
given
in
the
subjoined
table,
with
an
analysis
of
air
for
comparison.
The
gases
from
the
two
cold
springs
(Cold
and
North
Springs)
are
essentially
air
in
which
between
2
and
3
percent
of
oxygen
has
been
Teplaced
by
carbon
dioxide.
The
gas
from
Thundering
Spring
is
nearly
unmodified
air;
that
from
Warm
Springs
contains
7
percent
less
oxygen
than
is
found
in
air
and
correspondingly
more
nitrogen.
A
large
content
of
carbon
dioxide
in
a
spring
water
has
been
held
T>y
some
authorities
to
indicate
a
volcanic
origin
of
the
water.
The
small
amount
of
carbon
dioxide
in
the
gases
from
both
Thundering
Spring
and
Warm
Springs
may
thus
be
considered
indicative
of
a
meteoric
rather
than
a
volcanic
origin
of
the
water
of
the
warm
springs
>of
this
region.
Indeed,
the
highest
content
of
carbon
dioxide
is
found
in
the
gas
from
the
largest
cold
spring.
Analyses
of
gases
from
springs
in
Warm
Springs
district,
Georgia
[Samples
collected
by
W.
L.
Lamar,
Geological
Survey.
Analyses
by
W.
P.
Yant,
Bureau
of
Mines]
Laboratory
no
_______
"Nitrogen
1...
___
.
___
Total
.................
Warm
Springs
58705
85.50
13.91
.59
0
100.00
Mar.
3
58706
85.19
14.26
.55
0
100.00
1,
1934
Thundering
Spring
58703
79.01
20.87
.12
0
100.00
Apr.
1
58704
78.97
20.91
.12
0
100.00
2,1934
Cold Spring
58709
79.
69
18.01
2.30
0
100.00
Mar.
3
58710
79.72
18.00
2.28
0
100.00
1,1934
North
Spring
58707
79.66
17.70
2.64
0
100.00
Mar.
3
58708
79.77
17.63
2.60
0
100.00
1,1934
Air
79.
059
20.94
i
Including
argon
and
other
rare
gases.
OTHER
HYDROLOGIC
INVESTIGATIONS
The
distribution,
environment,
discharge,
chemical
character,
and
temperature
of
the
spring
waters
of
the
region
have
been
set
forth
In
the
preceding
pages.
In
order
to
throw
light
on
the
sources
of
the
waters
that
issue
from
the
several
warm
springs
and
from
the
large
springs
called
Cold Spring,
a
comprehensive
program
of
study
and
systematic
measurements
was
carried
out
between
October
1,
1933,
and
June
30,
1935.
Special
attention
was
given
to
the
rainfall,
water
levels
in
wells,
and
discharge
of
streams
in
an
area
of
32
square
miles
along
Pine
Mountain,
here
referred
to
as
the
Pine
Mountain
area
(pis.
7,
8).
About two-thirds
of
this
area
lies
within
the
Warm
22
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA.
Springs
quadrangle,
and
one-third
lies
west
of
it.
In
order
to
deter-
mine
the
approximate
quantity
of
water
that
falls
on
this
area,
rain
gages
were
installed
on
the
Roosevelt
and
Trammel
farms,
as
indi-
cated
on
plate
7.
Daily
readings
were
made
at
the
Roosevelt
gage,
and
weekly
readings
at
the Trammel
gage.
The
United
States
Weather
Bureau maintains
five
stations
within
35
miles
of
the
area.
To
obtain
information
concerning
the
level
of
the
ground
water
and
its
temperature,
four
quarterly
observations
were
made
at
36
wells
in
the
low
country
that
surrounds
the
Pine
Mountain
area,
and
observations
were
made
weekly
from
December
1933
to
June
30
r
1935,
at
six
other
wells.
To
determine
the
distribution
of
run-off
from
the
Pine
Mountain
area,
measurements
were
made
of
the
discharge
from
30
drainage
basins
in
the
area.
A
gaging
station
was
installed
on
Mill
Creek
r
which
is
the
most
accessible
of
the larger
streams,
and
a
continuous-
record
of
discharge
was
obtained
from
January
1,
1934,
to
June
30
r
1935.
At
selected
stations
on
the
other
29
streams,
measurements
of
discharge
were
made
intermittently
over
the
same
period.
RAINFALL
The
following
table
shows
the
monthly
rainfall
from
January
1934
to
June
1935,
recorded
by
the
gages
on
the
Roosevelt
and Trammel
farms
and
at
the
stations
maintained
by
the
United
States
Weather
Bureau
at
Columbus,
West
Point,
Woodbury,
and
Talbotton.
The
weekly
rainfall
at
the
Roosevelt
farm
is
shown
graphically
on
plates
4,
5,
and
6.
Monthly
rainfall,
in
inches,
in
or
near
the
Pine
Mountain
area
1934
June
July
...........
November
Total....
......................
.
1935
March
April..
.-_....
........
...............
-
.
May
Total.....
.......................
Roosevelt
farm
'
4.72
1.89
4.42
2
63
.99
1.99
45.
99
1.74
2.62
6.69
2
Q7
Trammel
farm
1
4.74
5.36
2.81
3.44
8.19
Q
97
.84
1.25
2.23
43.97
1.99
3.00
7.96
4.35
2.77
22.78
Colum-
bus
2
3.27
3.78
6.10
4.21
2.40
4.24
4.29
4.25
.40
1.33
2.47
39.94
1.83
2.61
6.13
4.15
2.30
2.63
19.65
West
Point
2
1.83
4.86
4.83
6.02
3.63
6.30
4.15
6.32
1.84
2.67
57.18
2.22
4.09
6.84
3.76
4.17
24.69
Wood-
bury
2
3.17
4.71
5.57
2.44
9.78
3.64
5.48
4.67
3.84
1.25
2.74
52.07
1.96
2.49
6.72
2.92
2.42
3.95
20.46
Talbot-
ton
i
4.19
7.36
6.23
4.15.
8.05
4.66
1.53
3.19
1.38
3.38.
1.73
2.54
7.85
3.07
3.37
3.12
21.68
1
Gages
installed
and
maintained
during
this
investigation.
2
Records
of
U.
S.
Weather
Bureau.
OTHER
HYDROLOGIC
INVESTIGATIONS
23
WATER
LEVELS
IN
WELLS
The
records
of
water
levels
that
were
obtained
in
six
wells
on
and
near
Pine
Mountain
indicate
that
in
the
lowlands,
where
the
ground-
water
table
is
generally
near
the
surface,
it
rises
immediately
and
abruptly
after
rains,
whereas
on
Pine
Mountain,
where
the
water
table
lies
at
greater
depths,
it
rises
slowly
after
rams
and
the
rise
is
relatively
less
than
in
the
lowlands
(pi.
6).
It
seems
significant
that
the
fluctuations
of
the
water
table
in
the
well
on
the
Roosevelt
farm,
which
is
sunk
in
the
lower
200
feet
of
the
Hollis
quartzite,
resemble
those
of
the
local
rainfall,
but
2
to
5
weeks
seems
to
elapse
before
high
rainfall
is
reflected
in
a
rise
in
the
local
water
table.
Both
curves
resemble
that
of
the
discharge
of
Warm
Springs,
in
which
high
dis-
charge
lags
6
or
7
weeks
behind
high
rainfall
(pi.
4).
STREAMS
In
the
hope
that
a
close
study
of
the
run-off
from
the
basins
of
the
Pine
Mountain
area
might
reveal
deficiencies
or
great
differences
that
would
aid
in
determining
the
source
of
the
waters
that
issue
at
Cold
and
Warm
Springs,
a
program
of
measurement
of
the
discharges
of
the
streams
was
undertaken.
The
30
drainage
basins
of
the
Pine
Mountain
area
are
shown
on
plates
7
and
8.
They
range in
area
from
44
to
2,520
acres;
11
basins
lie
south
of
the
crest
of
Pine
Mountain,
and
19
lie
north
of
it.
There
are
obvious
differences
in
the
form
and
other
features
of
these
basins
that
are
determined
largely
by
the
nature
and
attitude
of
the
under-
lying
rocks.
The
north
slope
of
Pine
Mountain
is
underlain
by
the
sheet
of
Hollis
quartzite
(fig.
1),
700
to
800
feet
thick,
which,
except
for
several
minor
folds,
dips
gently
north.
The
streams
that
flow
north
and
east
from
the
Pine
Mountain
divide
rise
in
small
swampy
areas
that
lie
at
the
junction
of
several
ravines.
As
they
leave
the
Pine
Mountain
area
most
of
them
flow
through
narrow
V-shaped
notches
cut
in
the
quartzite.
There
are
some
clearings
on
the
north
slope,
but
most
of
the
area
is
still
covered
with
the
native
forest.
Considerable clearing
has
been
done
in
the
eastern
basins.
For
most
of
its
length
within
this
area
Pine
Mountain
presents
a
steep
escarpment
toward
the
south,
and
the
basins
that
drain
south
are
largely
cut
in
the
Woodland
gneiss,
which
underlies
the
Hollis
quartzite.
Almost
half
of
the
area
within
these basins
is
cleared
and
cultivated.
The
streams
rise
in
timbered
swampy
areas
near
the
heads
of
the
basins.
So
far
as
possible,
the
discharge
of
all
the
streams
wa&
measured
where
they
were
crossed
by
the
county
roads
that
follow
the
base
of
the
mountain
on
its
north
and
south
sides.
The
geologic
study
of
Pine
Mountain
indicates
that
for
most
of
its-
length
the
divide
that
separates the
underground
water
which
flow&
north
from
that
which
flows
south
probably
lies
a
few
hundred
feet
24
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
south
of
the
topographic
divide
on
the
surface.
In
other
words,
if
all
other
influences
that
affect
the
stream
discharges
were
the
same,
.the
average
discharge
per
unit
of
area
from
the
northern
drainage
basins
should
be
a
little
greater
than
that
from
the
southern
basins.
In
order
to
obtain
data
concerning
the
discharge
of
the
streams,
the
following
procedure
was
adopted.
As
the
funds
available
did
not
permit
installation
of
gages
on
all
the
streams,
it
was
decided to
install
a
continuously
recording
gage
on
one
large
stream,
Mill
Creek,
which
drains
an
area
of
556
acres,
and
to
make numerous
intermittent
measurements
of
discharge
on
the
other
streams.
For
streams
that
discharged
less
than
200
gallons
a
minute,
a
small
venturi
flume
was
used;
for
larger
streams,
a
current
meter
was
used
at
a
place
of
simple
cross
section.
During
the
period
July
1,
1934,
to
June
30,
1935,
dis-
charge
of
the
larger
streams
was
measured
20
to
25
times;
that
of
the
smaller
streams,
11
to
15
times.
For
each
measurement
the
ratio
of
the
discharge
of
the
stream
to
that
of
the
control
stream,
Mill
Creek,
on
the
same
day
was
calculated.
The
average
of
these
ratios
was
assumed
to
represent
the
ratio
of
the
discharge
to
that
of
Mill
Creek
over
the
entire
year.
As
the
data
of
these
measurements
of
Mill
XDreek
and the
other
streams
are
voluminous, only
the
significant
results
are
presented
here;
details
will
be
given
in
the
final
report.
As
a
check,
the
distribution
of
discharge
was
determined
for
a
short
period
late
in
March
1934
and
for
the
year
July
1,
1934,
to
June
30,
1935.
Plate
7
shows
the
drainage
basins,
their
area,
and
the
discharge
of
their
streams,
in
gallons
per
minute
per
acre,
during
the
short
period
late
in
March
1934.
It
reveals
some
interesting
features.
It
shows
that
there
is
considerable
similarity
in
the
run-off
per
acre
of
the
basins
that
drain
southward
from
the
Pine
Mountain
divide.
If
the
run-off
from
five
small
basins
(nos.
25, 26, 27,
28,
29)
is
combined,
because
their
separate
drainage
divides
cannot
be
placed
accurately
on
the
only
map
available,
the
range in
run-off
was
from
0.50
to
0.90
gallon
per
minute
per
acre,
and
only
one
exceeded
0.64
gallon.
The
average
run-off
from
the
11
basins
that
lie
south
of
Pine
Mountain
was
0.66
gallon
per
minute
per
acre.
The
run-off
of
the
basins
that
lie
on
the
north
side
of
Pine
Mountain
showed
a
much
wider
range.
It
is
noteworthy
that
most
of
the
basins
that
lie
within
3
miles
west
and
southwest
of
Warm
Springs
discharged
much
less
than
the
average,
and
that
except in
time
of
storms,
no
surface
water
leaves
the
two
basins
that
lie
south
of
Warm
and
Cold
Springs.
The
average
run-off
of
all
the
basins
on
the
north
slope,
exclusive
of
the
discharge
of
the
Warm
and
Cold
Springs,
was
0.54
gallon
per
minute
per
acre.
If
to
the
discharge
of
the
streams
there
is
added
the
discharge
of
Cold
Spring
Branch
during
this
period
(1,672
gallons
per
minute),
the
average
discharge
was
0.66
gallon
per
minute
GEOLOGICAL
8TJEVET
WATEK-StTPPLY
PAPER
819
PLATE
7
84°45'
Average
discharge
of
a//
streams
north
of
Pine
Mountain
Divide
_
North
of
Pine
Mountain
Divide
inc/uding
Cofd
Springs
GALLON
PER.
MIN-
u
TE
f
3
^
A
CfZE
......
O.54
O.66
North
of
Pine
Mountain
Divide
including
Co/d
Springs
and
Warm
Springs
1
0
L
1
1
I I
1
I
I
1
i
O.
73
Mil1
Creek
gaging
xta.
5O7
SL,
etc.,
area,
in acres
Warm
Springs
31
aD/schorge
3
Miles
Average
discharge
of
crff
streams
south
of
Pine
Mountain
Divide
O.66
gct//on
per
minute
per
acr&
32^
50
84°45'
OUTLINE
MAP
OF
PINE
MOUNTAIN
DRAINAGE
BASINS
SHOWING
STREAM
DISCHARGE,
IN
GALLONS
PER
MINUTE
PER
ACRE, MARCH
12,
13, 14,
23,
1934.
Numbers
indicate location
of
stream-gaging
stations.
GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
WATER-SUPPLY
PAPER
819
PLATE
8
84*45
GALLON
PER
MIN-
Averape
discharge
ofa//^
streams
U
T£
PE*
ACRE
north
of
Pine
Mountain
Divide
_______
O.3I
Norih
of
Pine
Mountain
D/w'de
inc/udiny
Co/d
Spring's
0.43
,
507
a,
etc.,
area
/n
acres
Warm
Springs
North
of
Pine
Mountain
D/'v/de
fftc/udingr
Co/d
Sprt'ngs
and
Warm
Spr/n<ps
_:
Aver
acre
for
stations
BS
to
29
inclusive
(993
tares)
is
O.4O.
Average
discharge
of
a//
streams
south
ofP/ne
Mountain
Div/de
O.44
get,//on
per
minute
per
acre
OUTLINE
MAP
OF
PINE
MOUNTAIN
DRAINAGE
BASINS
SHOWING
STREAM
DISCHARGE,
IN
GALLONS
PER
MINUTE
PER
ACRE,
JULY
1,
1934,
TO
JUNE
30,
1935.
Numbers
indicate
location
of
stream-gaging
stations.
ROCK
FORMATIONS
25
per
acre,
a
figure
that
coincides
with
the
average
discharge
of
the
basins
south
of
the
divide.
The
"Warm
Springs
also
rise
on
the
northern
border
of
the
Pine
Mountain
area,
however,
and
if
their
discharge
during
this
period
(617
plus
288,
or
905
gallons
per
minute)
is
added
to
that
of
the
streams
and
Cold
Spring
Branch,
the
average
discharge
was
0.73
gallon
per
minute
per
acre.
For
the
longer
period July
1,1934,
to
June
30,1935 the
range
in
average
run-off
from
the
several
basins
was
not
so
great
as
it
was
for
the
short
period.
(See
pi.
8.)
For
the
basins
that
lie
south
of
the
Pine
Mountain
divide,
the
average
run-off
for
the
year
was
0.44
gallon
per
minute
per
acre.
For
the
basins
north
of
the
divide,
the
average
run-off
was
0.31
gallon
per
minute
per
acre.
If
to
the
run-off
is
added
the
average
discharge
of
Cold
Spring
Branch
for
the
period
(1,546
gallons
per
minute),
the
average
discharge
for
all
of
the area
north
of
the
divide
was
0.43
gallon
per
minute
per
acre.
If
the
dis-
charge
of
all
the
springs
of
the
Warm
Springs
area
(887
gallons
per
minute)
is
included
in
the
total,
the
average
discharge
was
0.51
gallon
per
minute
per
acre.
These
data
for
both
the
short
and
long periods
indicate
1.
That
the
streams
that
drain
the
basins
north
of
the
Pine
Moun-
tain
divide
discharge
less
water
per
minute
per
acre
than
those
that
drain
the
basins
south
of
the
divide.
2.
That
if
the
discharge
of
Cold
Spring
Branch
is
added
to
that
of
the
other
streams
north
of
the
divide,
the
total
expressed
in
gallons
per
minute
per
acre
approximately
equals
the
average
of
the
streams
south
of
the
divide.
,
3.
That
if,
to
the
discharge
of
the
streams
north
of
the
divide
and-
Cold
Spring
Branch,
there
is
also
added
the
discharge
of
the
springs
of
the
Warm
Springs
area,
the
average
is
slightly
higher
than
that
from
the
basins
south
of
the
divide.
The
significance
attached
to
these
conclusions
depends
largely
upon
the
confidence
that
is
placed
in the
stream-discharge
data
ob-
tained
under
the
circumstances
and
upon
the
accuracy
of
the
deter-
mination
that
the
ground-water
divide
lies
south
of
the
topographic
divide.
Without
doubt,
many
other
elements
affect
the
run-off
from
any
topographic
basin the
elements
that
affect
evaporation,
such
as
soil
and
vegetation;
the
elements
that
affect
transpiration,
such
as
kind
and
distribution
of
vegetation;
the
elements
that
affect
rate
of
absorp-
tion
and
discharge
of
water
by the
rocks.
Few
of
these
can
be
given
quantitative
value.
BOCK
FORMATIONS
The
rocks
that
underlie
the
Warm
Springs
quadrangle
represent
a
wide
variety
of
types.
On
the
basis
of
their
local
features
and
rela-
tions,
supplemented
by
knowledge
of
the
features
and
relations
of
26
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
similar
rocks
that
are
known
in
northern
Georgia,
they
have
been
separated
into
units,
whose
distribution
is
shown
on
the
geologic
map
(pi.
1).
With
the
exception
of
several
diabase
dikes
that
are
probably
of
Triassic
age
and
several
areas
of
surficial
sand
and
gravel
that
are
probably
Tertiary
or
later,
all
the
rocks
within
the
quadrangle
are
considered
to
be
pre-Cambrian.
These
include
several
large
masses
of
igneous
rocks
that
show
little
evidence
of
change
since
they
were
intruded
and
large
areas
of
sedimentary
and
igneous
rocks
that
have
undergone
considerable
alteration
(metamorphism)
since
they
were
originally
formed.
They
are
a
part
of
the belt
of
crystalline
rocks
that
underlies
much
of
the
Central Upland
of
Georgia
and
the
Pied-
mont
region
of
the
Carolinas
and
Virginia.
PRE-CAMBRIAN
ROCKS
NORTH
OF
TOWAUQA
FAULT
Carolina
gneiss.
The
oldest
rocks
of
this
area
include
biotite
gneiss
and
mica
schist
that
are
here
considered
to
be
the
equivalent
of
rocks
known
in
western
North
Carolina
as
the
Carolina
gneiss.
These
rocks
are
restricted
to
the
part
of
the
quadrangle
that
lies
north
of
the
Towaliga
fault
(pi.
1).
Most
of
them,
particularly
the
fine-grained
biotite
gneiss
and
thinly
laminated
muscovite
schist,
are
considered
to
be
sedimentary
deposits
that
have
been
recrystal-
lized
without
the
addition
of
much
new
material.
The
mapped
unit,
however,
contains
large
areas
of
coarser-grained
and
more
strongly
foliated
rocks,
made
up
of
oligoclase,
biotite,
and
quartz
with
sporadic
muscovite
and
garnet,
that
are
considered
to
be
sedimentary
material
that
has
been
thoroughly
injected
by
granite.
Much
of
the
schist
also
contains
thin
lenses
of
pegmatite
that
conform
to
the
lamination.
Within
the
main body
of
Carolina
gneiss
there
are
numerous
small
lenticular
bodies
of
dark-green
to
black
gneiss
made
up
largely
of
hornblende,
plagioclase,
and
quartz.
The
lamination
of
the
Carolina
gneiss
is
in
large
part
steeply
inclined,
and
the
trends
show
that
it
has
been
involved
in
folding.
The
lenses
of
dark
gneiss
conform
with
the
lamination
of
the
Carolina
gneiss,
and
the
relations
indicate
that
the
dark
gneiss
may
be
the
equivalent
of
the
Roan
gneiss
of
western
North
Carolina,
which
is
inferred
to
be
a
recrystallized
basaltic
rock
intrusive
in
the
Carolina
gneiss.
Snelson
granite.
A
large
area
in
the
northwest
quarter
of
the
Warm
Springs
quadrangle
is
underlain
by
granite
which
is
made
up
largely
of
oligoclase,
microcline,
quartz,
and
biotite
and
which
is
here
called
the
Snelson
granite
because
it
is
well
exposed
near
Snelson's
Crossroads,
*
2Yz
miles
east
of
Harris.
Most
of
the
biotite
flakes
are
arranged
in
rudely
parallel
layers,
so
that
the
rock
has
a
persistent
foliation.
In
contrast
with
the
Carolina
gneiss,
the
foliation
shows
small
folds
and
minute
plications.
Like
the
gneiss,
however,
the
Snelson
granite
is
cut
by
numerous
pegmatite
dikes,
some
of
which
contain
tourmaline.
BOOK
FORMATIONS
27
Regional
and
local
relations
indicate
that
the
granite
is
intrusive
into
the
gneiss.
The
contact
between
these
rocks
is
not
sharp
but
broadly
gradational,
and
near
it
the
gneiss
contains numerous
lenses
of
granitic
material
that
have
been
injected
along
the
planes
of
lamination.
The
area
within
which
the
Carolina
gneiss,
Snelson
granite,
and
Roan
gneiss
are
included
ends
southward
against
a
narrow
belt
of
sheared
rock,
largely
Carolina
gneiss,
which
has
been
traced
for
many
miles
through
western
Georgia
and
is
known
as
the
Towaliga
fault
zone.
Without
doubt
it
is
a
major
structural
feature,
for
the
rocks
that
lie
north
of
it
are
not
known
south
of
it,
and
conversely
those
that
lie
south
of
it
are
not
known
north
of
it.
PBE-CAMBBIAN
BOCKS
SOUTH
tfF
TOWALIGA
FAULT
Sparks
schist.
The
oldest
rocks
in
the
area
south
of
the
Towaliga
fault
are
confined
to
a
belt
3
to
5
miles
wide
that
extends
eastward
across
the
quadrangle
between
Pine
and
Oak
Mountains.
The
belt
includes
several
varieties
of
mica
schist,
biotite
gneiss,
and
quartzite,
which
are
so
interlayered
as
not
to
be
separable
in
areal
mapping.
These
rocks
are
here
called
the
Sparks
schist,
because
they
are
well
exposed
along
Sparks
Creek,
which
flows
southward
near
the
western
border
of
the
quadrangle.
The
schist
is
a
medium-grained
rock
made
up
largely
of
muscovite,
biotite,
quartz,
and
feldspar.
The
gneiss
is
made
up
of
feldspar,
biotite,
and
minor
quartz
and
garnet
and ranges
from
fine-
to
coarse-grained.
There
are
thin
beds
of
quartzite
in
both
the
schist
and
the
gneiss.
In
contrast
with
the
overlying
Hollis
quartzite,
however,
they
contain
more
feldspar
and
grade
into
feld-
spathic
quartz-mica
schist.
The
Sparks
schist
is
considered
to
be
a
highly
metamorphosed
sedimentary
deposit
into
which considerable
granitic
material
has
been
injected.
Hollis
quartzite.
Overlying
the
Sparks
schist
is
the
Hollis
quartzite,
a
distinctive,
persistent
unit
that
is
important
in
the
problem
of
both
warm
and
cold
spring
waters
in this
region.
The name
'was
first
applied
by
Adams
4
to
quartzites
that
crop
out
near
Hollis,
on
the
Central
of
Georgia
Railway,
6
miles
southeast
of
Opelika,
Ala.
Field
work
during
recent
years
has
shown
that
the
quartzite
may
be
readily
traced
from
the
vicinity
of
Notasulga,
Ala.,
northeastward
about
100
miles
to
Barnesville,
Ga.
It
is
well
exposed
in
the
"Warm
Springs
quadrangle,
where
it
sustains
the
persistent
ridges
of
Pine
Mountain
and
Oak
Mountain.
All
the
warm
springs
of
the
region
and
appar-
ently
most
of
the
larger
cold
springs
issue
along
or
near
the
upper
layer
of
quartzite,
where
it
dips
under
the
overlying
Manchester
schist.
At
several
localities
in
Alabama
a
thick
layer
of
dolomite,
the
'
Adams,
G.
D.,
Geology
of
Alabama:
Alabama
Geol.
Survey
Special
Kept.
14,
p.
36,1936;
The
significance
of
the
quartzite
of
Pine
Mountain
in
the
crystallines
of
west-central
Georgia:
Jour.
Geology,
vol,
38,
pp.
271-279,1930;
General
geology
of
the
crystallines
of
Alabama:
Jour.
Geology,
vol.
41,
pp.
169-171,1933.
28
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
(GEORGIA
Chewacla
marble,
is
present
near
the
Hollis
quartzite,
but
the
sequence-
is
not
clear.
The
Chewacla
marble
is
not
known
in
western
Georgia^
The
features
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
are
well
shown
in
the
Warm
Springs
quadrangle
at
numerous
natural
exposures
on
the
slopes
of
Pine
and
Oak
Mountains,
especially
in
the
gorges
cut
by
the
Flint
River
and
in
numerous
road
and
railway
cuts.
Measurements
of
its
thickness
on
Pine
Mountain
range
from
275
feet
at
Dunn's
Gap
to
nearly
800
feet
along
the
Flint
River
where
it
passes
through
the-
Cove.
Along
Oak
Mountain
the
thickness
appears
rarely
to
exceed
300
feet.
Throughout
this
region
the
quartzite
is
very
pure
silica_
Muscovite
commonly
occurs
in
small
amounts;
very
rarely,
green
chromium
mica
is
present.
Albite
feldspar
occurs
at
a
few
places.
Sparse
rounded
grains
of
zircon
arranged
in
parallel
layers
tend
to
confirm
the
sedimentary
origin
of
the
quartzite.
In
this
region
the-
upper
and
lower
100
feet
are
generally
thin-bedded
and
the
middle*
part
is
thick-bedded.
Artificial
exposures
of
the
upper
part
commonly
show
layers
of
rather
pure
silica,
an
eighth
of
an
inch
to
an
inch
thick,,
separated
by
thin persistent
layers
of
mica;
such
material
where-
weathered
is
commonly
flexible,
and
the
name
"itacolumite"
has
been
applied
to
it.
By
contrast,
the
beds
of
the
middle
part
in
numerous
natural
exposures
are
2
to
10
feet
thick
and
are
broken
only
by
vertical
joints.
^The
examination
of
numerous
polished
and
thin
sections
of
the
quartzite
failed
to
reveal
evidence
of
the
size
and
shape
of
the-
original
grains
of
quartz,
of
which
it
was
doubtless
once
composed.
At
present
the
grains
are largest in
the
thick-bedded
material
and
smallest
in
the
thin-bedded
material.
In
the
thick-bedded
rock
most
of
the
volume
is
made
up
of
grains
5
to
10
millimeters
(0.2
to
0.4
inch>
long;
in the
thin-bedded
rock
few
grains
exceed
1
millimeter.
In.
shape
the
grains
are
irregularly
elongated
parallel
to
the
bedding,
but
their
outlines
are
also
minutely irregular
or
crenulate
and
inter-
locking.
Most
of
the
grains
show
undulatory
extinction
under
the
microscope.
The plates
of
muscovite extend
from
one
grain
of
quartz
into
another
adjoining.
In
contrast
to
most
unmetamorphosed
sandstones,
this
quartzite-
would
seem
to
be
a
poor
aquifer.
Tests
of
numerous
specimens,
however,
including
one
from
the
bottom
of
the
90-foot
Norris
well
recently
dug
on
Pine
Mountain,
show
that
colored
liquids
penetrate-
it
rapidly.
It
is
therefore
believed
that
the
upper
and
lower
thin-
bedded
parts,
each
100
feet
or
more
thick,
are
relatively
permeable
and
act
as
fair
water
carriers,
in
contrast
with
the
middle,
more-
massive
part,
which
seems
to
be
relatively
impervious.
On
the
top
and
along
the
upper
slopes
of
Pine
Mountain
the
quartzite
weathers-
to
loosely
coherent
sand.
The
Butts
well,
on
the
top
of
Pine
Moun-
tain,
was
dug
to
a
depth
of
85
feet
in
the
middle
part
of
the
quartzite-
by
the
use
of
pick
and
shovel.
By
contrast,
blasting
was
necessary-
BOOK
FORMATIONS
29
in
digging
the
Norris
well
to
a depth
of
90
feet
in
the
quartzite
about
300
feet
below
the
top.
Where
the
Hollis
quartzite
is
thin-bedded,
it
seems
quite
clear
that
the
laminations
represent
the
stratification
of
the
original
sandstone.
In
the
thick-bedded
portions,
however,
local
discordances
of
the
part-
ing surfaces
raise
doubt
concerning
the
accuracy
with
which
they
show
the
attitude
of
the
entire
sheet.
The
field
work
shows
that
in
most
places
the
parting
surfaces
of
the
upper and
lower
thin-bedded
quartz-
ite
reveal
the
structure
of
the
unit.
Manchester
schist. A
thick
mass
of
mica
schist
and biotite
gneiss,
here
called
the
Manchester
schist,
overlies
the
Hollis
quartzite.
It
is
named
for
the
largest
town
in
this
quadrangle.
The
formation
is
exposed
in
two
belts
that
extend
generally
northeast,
one of
which
lies
north
of
Pine
Mountain
and
the
other
south
of
Oak
Mountain.
There
is
considerable
resemblance
between
the
Manchester
schist,
above
the
Hollis
quartzite,
and
the
Sparks
schist,
below
the
quartzite,
and
it
is
thought
that
both
were
originally
sedimentary
deposits
that
have
undergone similar
changes.
The
mica
schist
is
largely
musco-
vite,
but
variable
amounts
of
quartz,
biotite,
and
oligoclase
are
present.
Accessory
minerals
include
garnet
and
apatite;
more
rarely
hypersthene
and
kyanite.
In
the
vicinity
of
Warm
Springs
the
schist
contains
enough
graphite
to
mark
paper.
Most
of
the
gneissic
ma-
terial
is
present
as
thin
layers,
largely
a
quarter
of
an
inch
to
several
inches
thick.
The
rock contains
considerable
plagioclase
(oligoclase
to
andesine),
some
of
which
forms
large
augenlike
crystals,
quartz,
biotite,
muscovite,
and
garnet.
Accessory
minerals
include
zircon,
apatite,
orthoclase,
tourmaline,
and
rutile;
more
rare
are
chlorite
and
calcite.
At
about
850
feet
above
the
base
of
the
Manchester
schists,
both
south
of
Oak
Mountain
and
locally
north
of
Pine
Mountain, there
is
a
persistent
bed
of
quartzite
that
ranges from
50
to
300
feet
in
thick-
ness.
It
closely
resembles
the
Hollis
quartzite.
Woodland
gneiss.
The area
south
of
the
Towaliga
fault
contains
bodies
of
pre-Cambrian
igneous
rocks
of
two
varieties an
earlier,
here
called
the
Woodland
gneiss,
and
a
later,
here
called
the
Cun-
ningham
granite.
The
earlier rock
is confined
to
the
belt
that
lies
between
Pine
and
Oak
Mountains;
the
later
rock
is
found
both
in
this
belt
and south
of
Oak
Mountain.
The
Woodland
gneiss
is
named
for
the
town
of
Woodland,
in
the
southeast
corner
of
the
quadrangle.
It
is
largely
a
coarse-grained
biotite
augen
gneiss,
so
called
on
account
of
the
coarse
lenticular
orthoclase
crystals
that
are
rather
uniformly
distributed
through
a
medium-grained
mass
of
orthoclase,
quartz,
and biotite.
Muscovite
and
garnet
are
common,
and
apatite
and
zircon
are
sparingly
present.
The
Woodland
gneiss
persistently
underlies
the
basal
bed
of
the
30
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
Hollis
quartzite
in
this
quadrangle.
The
100
feet
or
more
of
gneiss
that
immediately
underlies
the
quartzite
is
thinly
laminated,
locally
almost
schistose;
progressively
lower
or
deeper
in
the
mass
the
lami-
nation
is
more
widely
spaced,
and
the
rock
assumes
the
common
gneissic
texture.
As
this
gneiss
is
the
most
completely
metamor-
phosed
of
the
igneous
rocks
of
this
region,
it
is
assumed
to
be
the
oldest.
Cunningham
granite.
The
Cunningham
granite
forms
one
large
and
several
small
bodies
in
the
south
half
of
the
quadrangle.
In
contrast
with
the
other
igneous
and
metamorphic
rocks
of
the
region,
it
is
dark
in
color,
and
the
boundaries
can
be
traced
with
confidence.
Commonly
it
is
a massive
coarse-grained
rock
made
up
of
orthoclase,
andesine,
quartz,
biotite,
garnet,
augite,
and
hypersthene,
named
in
the
order
of
their
abundance;
apatite,
zircon,
and
piedmontite
are
accessory
minerals.
In
a
few
places
the
rock
is
gneissic.
The
boundaries
locally
cut
across
the
lamination
of
the
Woodland
gneiss,
and
the
granite
is
believed
to
be
intrusive
in
this
rock.
It
is
named
for
Cunningham
Crossroads,
southeast
of
Manchester,
where
the
central
part
of
the largest
mass
of
the
rock
is
exposed.
TBIASSIC
IGNEOUS
BOOKS
Several
diabase
dikes
are
present in
the
quadrangle.
They
are
interesting
because
they
are
uncommonly
long
for
their
width and
because
they
cut
across
all
the
other
rocks
of
the
region.
The
longest
of
these,
the
Talbotton
dike,
which
crosses
Oak
Mountain
4,000
feet
west
of
Woodland,
extends
for
35
miles,
but
its
maximum
width
is
only
155
feet.
The
average
width
of
the
other
dikes
is
about
30
feet.
The
dike
rock
is
largely
made
up
of
laths
of
labradorite
with
augite;
quartz,
biotite,
and
iron
oxides
are
sparingly
present;
olivine
is
not
known
in
the
dikes
of
this
area.
Such
dikes
have
been
found
over
a
large
area
in
the
Piedmont
region.
They
are
generally
assigned
to
the
Triassic.
TERTIARY
(?)
AND LATER
SEDIMENTARY
ROCKS
The topographic
map
shows
that
the
high
parts
of
Pine
Mountain
in
this
region
are
nearly
flat.
These
flat
surfaces
range
in
altitude
from
about
1,250
feet
to
1,395
feet
on
Dowdell
Knob,
which
is
the
highest
point
in
the
quadrangle.
They
appear
to
be
remnants
of
a
flat
surface
that
was
once
extensive
in
this
region
but
is
now
preserved
only
where
it
is
underlain
by
resistant
Hollis
quartzite.
Most
of
these
flat
remnants
show
thin
sporadic
patches
of
subangular
to
round
quartzite
pebbles,
mainly
from
1
to
3
inches
in
diameter.
The
pebbles
do
not
form
a
continuous
layer
but
are
embedded
in
the
layer
of
residual
sandy
soil
1
to
2
feet
thick
derived
from
the
Hollis
quartzite.
Until
the
geologic
features
of
a
large
region
in
central
Georgia
are
further
studied
the
correlation
and
age
of
these
gravel
deposits
can
STRUCTURAL
FEATURES
31
only
be
inferred.
For
the
present
it
seems
that
they
were
laid
down
by
coastal
streams
at
some
stage
in
the Tertiary
period.
At
four
localities
on
the
north,
east,
and
south
borders
of
the
wide
lobe
of
Pine
Mountain
south
of
Warm
Springs
there
are
patches
of
unconsolidated
sand
and
clay
that
rest
on
deeply
weathered
crystalline
rocks,
mostly
Manchester
schist.
Their
outcrops
range
in
altitude
from
850
to
980
feet,
and
the
thickest
appears
to
be
about
90
feet
thick.
Particular
interest
is
attached
to them
because
at
least
one,
that
near
Mount
Hope
Church,
contains
masses
of
bauxite
and
kaolin,
several
of
which
have
been
explored
and
have
yielded a
small
production.
The
age
of
these
deposits
is
obscure,
but
they
are
younger
than
the
gravel
on
Pine
Mountain.
STRUCTURAL FEATURES
'
All
the
rocks
of
this
area,
except
the
diabase
dikes
and
unconsolidated
materials,
are
metamorphic that
is,
they
have
been
thoroughly
re-
crystallized
since
their
original
formation.
The
rocks
that
were
once
sediments
now
include
mica
schist,
quartzite,
and
biotite
gneiss;
igneous
rocks
are represented
by granite
gneiss,
augen
gneiss,
and
hornblende
gneiss.
Furthermore,
most
of
the
rocks, as
a
result
of
these
changes,
have
assumed
a
strong
foliation.
Although
the
folia-
tion
of
the
sedimentary
rocks
now
lies
in
diverse
attitudes,
it
is
almost
certainly
closely
coincident
with
the
original
bedding.
This
is
par-
ticularly
evident
in
the
Hollis
quartzite,
where
bedding
is
indicated
by
layers
of
different
texture
and
foliation
is
indicated
by
alinement
of
mica
scales.
The
outstanding
fault
is
that
known
as
the
Towaliga
fault,
which
crosses
the
area
north
of
Warm
Springs,
extending
in
a
northeasterly
direction
(pis.
1
and
2).
In
places
the
evidence
is
good
that
the
fault
plane
dips
about
50°
NW.,
but
as
the
Carolina
gneiss,
which
lies
north
of
the
fault,
is
the
oldest
rock
in
the
region,
and
the
rocks
of
the
Wa-
coochee
belt,
which
lie
south
of
the
fault,
appear
to
be
much
younger,
it
follows
that
the
region
north
of
the fault
has
been
raised,
and
the
fault
must
be
regarded
as
an
overthrust.
It
also
follows
from
this
interpretation
that
the
Hollis
quartzite
dipping
northwest
from
Pine
Mountain must
be
cut
off
in
depth
by
this
fault.
These
relations
are
used
to
explain
the
probable
course
of
the
water
that
appears
at
Warm
Springs.
The
diabase
dikes
fill
fractures,
but
these
do
not
appear
to
be
faults.
A
small
fault
displaces
one
of
the
dikes,
and
two
other
faults
are
indi-
cated
on
the
south
side
of
Pine
Mountain
near
Nebula.
Without
doubt
there
are
many
other
faults and
fractures
in
this
region,
but
they
do
not
appear
to
be
extensive
enough
or
great
enough
to
displace
noticeably
the
boundaries
of
the
formations
that
have
been
mapped.
Several
large
anticlinal
folds
and numerous
small
ones
are
revealed
by
the
mapping
of
the
Hollis
quartzite.
The
largest
is
that
of
which
32
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
OF
GEORGIA
the
outcrops
on
Pine
Mountain
form
the
north
limb
and
those
on
Oak
Mountain
the
south
limb.
The
Cove
is
carved
out
of
the
center
of
a
nearly
circular
dome,
so
that
the
Hollis
quartzite
forms
the
limit-
ing
rim.
Numerous
small
folds,
both
anticlines
and
synclines,
are
revealed
by
outcrops
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
on
the
crest
of
Pine
Mountain
south
of
Warm
Springs
and
near
the
Flint
River
and
by
outcrops
of
the
Manchester
schist.
The
small
anticline
shown
by
outcrops
of
Hollis
quartzite
around
the
hill
occupied
by the
Warm
Springs
Foundation
seems
to
be
a
factor
in
localizing
the
outlet
of
Warm
Springs
(pi.
3).
Most
of
the
minor
folds
of
the
region
are
indicated
on
plate
3.
SOURCE
OF
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
WATER
I
The
data
from
several
phases
of
this
investigation
tend
to
show
that
the
water
issuing
from
the
Warm
Springs
is
that
which
falls
as
rain
on
the
high
parts
of
Pine
Mountain
within
several
miles
of
the
springs.
These
data
may
be
summarized
briefly
as
follows:
1.
The
surface
run-off
from
the
drainage
basins
north
of
the
Pine
Mountain
divide
is
less
per
unit
of
area
than
that
of
the
basins
south
of
the
divide,
and
this
difference
is
about
made
up by
the
combined
dis-
charge
of
Warm
Springs
and
Cold
Springs
(pis.
7,8).
2.
The
run-off
per
unit
of
area
of
the
basins
that
drain
southward
from
Pine
Mountain
is
rather
uniform;
by
contrast,
the
basins
that
drain
northward
show
great
variations
in
run-off,
and
there
is
a
notable
deficiency
in
the
basins
that
lie
within
3
miles
south
and
southwest
of
Warm
Springs.
The
two
fairly
large
basins
that
lie
south
of
Warm
Springs
and
Cold
Springs yield
no run-off
except
during
storms.
3.
The
fluctuations
in
discharge
of
Warm
Springs
have
a
definite
re-
semblance
to
the
fluctuations
in
rainfall
as
shown
by
the
gage
on
the
top
of
Pine
Mountain,
3
miles
south,
but
the
highs
and
lows
of
spring
discharge
lag
6
or
7
weeks
behind
the
highs
and
lows
of
rainfall
(pi.
4).
The
water
level in
a
well
in
the
lower
part
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
near
the
rain
gage
on
Pine
Mountain
shows
similar
highs
and
lows
that
also
lag
2
to
5
weeks
behind
those
of
rainfall
(pL
4).
This
relation
is
one
that
would
be
expected
if
the
well
penetrates
an
aquifer
that
is
connected
with
the
conduit
by
which
the
water
of
Warm
Springs
rises
to
the
surface.
4.
The
water
of
Warm
Springs
is
relatively
low
in
dissolved
solids;
it
does
not
contain
boron,
and,
so
far
as
shown
by
the
analyses,
it
does
not
contain
any
dissolved
ingredients
that
suggest
a
deep
igneous
origin.
5.
The
gases
dissolved
in
the
water
of
Warm
Springs
are
those
found
in the
air,
and
they
occur
in
about
the
same
proportion
that
they
occur
in
the
air,
except
that
the
percentage
of
nitrogen
is
slightly
higher
and
the
percentage
of
oxygen
slightly
lower.
Carbon
dioxide,
if
SOURCES
OF
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
;WATER
present
in
large
quantities,
might indicate
a
deep
igneous.originybufi
this
gas
occurs
in
the
water
of
Warm
Springs
in
<)nly
moderate
amounts,'
such
as
would
normally
be
dissolved
by
water
of
surface
origin
Hfrom
the
air
and
soil in
fact
it
is
even
less
in
Warm
Springs
than
in
Cold
Spring.
The
structure
of
the
rocks
in
the
vi-
cinity
of
Warm
Springs
is
shown
in
the
geologic
section
given
in
figure
1.
The
structure
at
considerable
depths
of
course
could
not
be
observed,
but
it
is
inferred
from
the
structure
as
re-
vealed
at
the
surface.
The
arrows
in
the
figure
show
the
probable
path
of
the
water
discharged
by
Warm
Springs.
Starting
as
rain
on
parts
of
Pine
Moun-
tain
where
the
dense
middle
member
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
has
been
re-
moved
by
erosion
or
is
sufficiently
fractured
to
permit
some
downward
percolation,
the
water
percolates
into
the
permeable
basal
beds
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
and
thence
northward
through
these
beds
to
great
depths,
where
it
becomes
heated
by
the
nat-
ural
heat
of
the
rocks.
From
the
struc-
ture
of
the
rocks
and
the
thermal
gradient
(p.
34)
it
is
concluded
that
the
water
percolates
northward
nearly
to
the
Towaliga
fault.
Near
the
fault
it
probably
percolates
upward,
through
fractures
in
the
dense
middle
member
of
the
Hollis
quartzite,
into
the
upper
permeable beds
of
this
formation.
Thence
it
is
forced
upward
by
artesian
pressure
through
these
permeable
beds,
in
which
it
is
confined
by
the
nearly
impermeable
middle
member
below
and by
the
nearly
impermeable
Manchester
schist
above,
and
even-
tually
it
reaches
the
surface
at
Warm
Springs.
In
its
upward
course,
before
it
reaches
the
surface,
the
;
water
flows
mainly
through
one
or
more
natural
conduits,
which
may
have
been
pro-
duced largely
by
the
solvent
action
of
the
water.
34
THE
WjSbBM
SPRINGS.OF
GEORGIA
The
remaining
warm
springs
of
the
region,
Parkman,
Brown's,
Thundering,
Barker,
LAfsey,
and
Taylor,
rise
either
from
Manchester
schist
within
a
few
hundred
feet
above
the
top
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
or from
the
thin
layers
of
local
alluvium
that
overlies
the
schist.
As
shown
in
plate
2,
the
areal
distribution
of
the
warm
springs
in
the
Wacoochee
belt
of
rocks
clearly
indicates
a
relation
to
these rocks,
particularly
to
the
Hollis
quartzite,
but
the
observations
which
would
be
needed
to
indicate
the
course
of
the
water
that
now
issues
at
these
warm
springs
have
not
been
made.
The
water
may
either
have
entered
the
upper
layers
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
and
descended
several
hundred
feet
below
the
surface
before
encountering
fractures
through
which
it
could
rise
to
the
surface,
or,
conceivably,
it
may
have
entered
the
lower
layers
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
and,
after
descending
below
the
surface,
encountered
fractures
that
crossed
the
entire
thickness
of
quartzite
as
well
as
the
overlying
Manchester
schist.
Without
doubt,
the
Towaliga
fault
persists
to
great
depth.
If
it
were
assumed
that
it
cuts
deep
reservoirs
of
water,
possibly
of
volcanic
origin,
one
would
expect
these
waters
to
rise
as
warm
springs
along
the
fault.
Most
of
the
warm
springs,
however,
appear
at
the
surface
from
3
to
8
miles
distant
from
the
fault.
It
is
believed,
therefore,
that
the
fault
plays
no
direct
part
in
localizing
the
distribution
of
the
springs.
SOURCE
OF
THE
HEAT
OF
WARM
SPRINGS
WATER
The
diagram
that
is
presented
as
figure
1
to
show
the
source
and
path
of
the
water
that
issues
at
Warm
Springs
indicates
also
the
prob-
able
source
of
the
heat.
There
can
be
little
doubt
that
the
Hollis
quartzite
extends
northward
from
the
springs
under
the
Manchester
schist
and
ends
in
depth
against
the
Towaliga
fault.
The
dip
of
the
quartzite
as
it
passes
downward
under
the
schist
and
the
dips
shown
in
the
schist
indicate
that
the
quartzite
attains
a
depth
of
about
3,800
feet
below
the
local
surface.
As
no
record
of
thermal
gradients
in
the
crystalline
rocks
of
Georgia
was
available,
accurate
measurements
of
temperature
were
made
at
100-foot
intervals
in
two
wells
during
this
investigation.
There
are
numerous
wells
in
the
crystalline
rocks
as
much
as
800
feet
deep
from
which
water
is
pumped
for
use
as
local
domestic
supplies.
The
wells
chosen
for
measurement
were
one
\%
miles
west
of
Griffin,
Ga.,
757
feet
deep,
and
another
at
Youngs
Mill,
6
miles
northeast
of
LaGrange,
618
feet
deep,
respectively
35
miles
northeast
and
23
miles
northwest
of
Warm
Springs.
Neither
well
had
been
used
for
several
years
before
the
temperature
was
measured.
Both
wells
were
drilled
in
granite
gneiss,
which
appears
to be
included
in
the
Carolina
gneiss
of
this
region.
Only
the
temperatures
below a
depth
of
300
feet
were
used
in
calculating
the
thermal
gradient.
In
the
Griffin
well
the
temperature
increased
0.95°
F.
for
each
100
feet
in
depth,
and
in the
SOURCE
OF
THE
COLD
SPRING
WATER
35
LaGrange
well,
1.20°
F.
These
gradients
indicate
a
temperature
of
99.2°
F.
at
a
depth
of
3,800
feet
at
the
Griffin
well
and
of
89.5°
F.
at
the
LaGrange
well.
It
appears
that
a
thermal
gradient
such
as
that
found
at
the
LaGrange
well
is
sufficient
to
heat
the
water
so
that
it
could
be
delivered
at
the
surface
at
a
temperature
of
88°
F.,
after
allowance
is
made
for
the
loss
of
heat
that
must
occur
during
the
up-
ward
movement
of
the
water.
This
is
the
temperature
of
the
Warm
Springs
water.
The
geologic
and
thermal
data
indicate,
therefore,
that
water
enter-
ing
the
ground
on
Pine
Mountain
at
a
temperature
of
62°
F.
can
be
carried
in
the
Hollis
quartzite
to
a
depth
of
about
3,800
feet
and
re-
turned
to
the
surface
at
a
temperature
of
88°
F.
SOURCE
OF
THE
COLD
SPRING
WATER
Even
the
casual observer
is
impressed
by
the
fact
that
the largest
cold
spring
of
this
region
(Cold
Spring)
appears
at
the
surface
scarcely
a
mile
from
the
largest
warm
spring
(Warm
Springs),
and
it
is
natural
to
wonder
whether
they may
be
related.
During
the
period
of
study,
the
discharge
of
Cold
Spring
Branch,
as
noted
from
32
measurements,
ranged
from
1,282
to
1,822
gallons
a
minute
and
the
average
was
1,546
gallons.
This
is
essentially
the
discharge
of
the
four
cold
springs.
Although
the area
of
the
surface
drainage
basin
of
Cold
Spring
Branch
is
507
acres,
there
is
no
run-off
from
that
part
of
the
basin
above
Cold
Spring.
As
the
average
dis-
charge
of
Cold
Spring
Branch
represents
all
the
water
that
would
fall
as
rain
on
667
acres
at
theTate
of
45
inches
a
year,
it
is
clear
that
Cold
Spring
must
receive
water
from
a
larger area
than
the
surface
basin
that
lies
above
it.
Both
the
chemical
character
and the
temperature
of
the
water
indicate
that
it
has
not
penetrated
far
below
the
surface
of
the
ground.
A
study
of
the
rainfall
and
run-off
from
the
Mill
Creek
Basin,
5
miles
west
of
Warm
Springs,
indicates
that
33
percent
of
the
rainfall
is
represented
by the
run-off
of
the
stream,
the
remaining
67
percent
being
lost
by
evaporation,
transpiration,
percolation
out
of
the
basin,
and
other
minor
processes.
From
this
study
it
would
appear
that
these
cold
springs
are
discharging
the
water
that
is
absorbed
as
rain
in
the
shallow
surficial
zone
of
an
area
that
must
range from
1,500
to
2,000
acres,
south
and
southwest
of
the
springs.
This calculation
indicates,
therefore,
that
the
water
discharged
by
the
cold
springs
must
represent
the
rainfall,on
several
Jiearby-surface
basins
taut
that
much«
of
the
water,
instead
of
following
the
surface
drains,
enters
the
permeable
upper
200
feet
of
Hollis
quartzite,
follows
this
zone
laterally
eastward
below
the
Manchester
schist,
and
is
delivered
as
cold
springs
at
the
lowest
surface
outcrop
of
this
zone.
The
existence
of
the
largest
cold
spring
relatively
near
the
largest
warm
spring
is
probably
to
be
explained
by
the
areal
extent
of
the
36
THE
WABM
SPRINGS,OF
GEORGIA
outcrop-
and
the
structure
of
the
Hollis
qdartz&e.
It
has
been
stated
earlier
that
the
distribution
of
the
known
warm
springs
of
Georgia
seems
to
be
related
to
and
therefore
controlled
by
the
belt
of
Hollis'
quartzite.
Plate
2
.shows
the
approximate
areal
extent
of
the
quartz*
ite
outcrops.
Where
the
outcrop
is
narrow
the quartzite
dips
steeply;
where
it
is
broad
the
quartzite
is
either
closely
folded,
as
near
the
Flint
River,
or
reveals
broad
gentle
folds,
as
south
of
Warm
Springs.
The
great
lobe
of
quartzite
that
forms
Pine
Mountain
south
of
Warm
Springs
is
the
largest
outcropping
body
of
the
quartzite
and,
although
gently
folded,
it
dips
generally
north
and
northeast.
Such
an
area
offers
the
best
opportunity
in
the
region
for
the
upper
part
of
the
Hollis
quartzite
to
absorb
rainfall.
The
general
trend
of
movement
and
point
of
discharge
of
such
absorbed
water
would
be
governed
by
the
structure
of
the
beds
and
the
distribution
of
ravines.
It
seems
reasonable,
therefore,
that
the
largest
cold
spring
of
the
region
should
be
found
adjacent
to
the
largest
outcrop
of
gently
dipping
quartzite,
According
to
the
interpretation
of
the
source
and
underground
move-
ment
of
the
water
of
Warm
Springs,
offered
here,
it
is
reasonable
that
this
water,
too,
should
be
found
adjacent
to
the
largest
outcrop
of
Hollis
quartzite.
Both
springs
apparently
derive
their
water
from
rain
falling
on
the
surface.
The
difference
in
temperature
is
due
to
the
difference
in
the
depth
to
which
the
water
percolates
in
the
earth
before
reappearing
at
the
surface.
MEASURES
FOB
IMPROVING
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
It
was
the
hope
of
the
officials
of
the
Georgia
Warm
Springs
Foundation
that,
as
the
result
of
this
investigation,
ways
might
be
found
by
which
the
temperature
of
the
water and
perhaps
the
dis-
charge,
might
be
increased.
The
investigation
shows
that
about
two-thirds
of
the
total
supply
of
warm
water
in
the
area,
or
about
.550
gallons
a
minute,
has
an
observed
temperature
ranging
only
between
87.7°
and
88.2°
F.,
and
that
it
issues
from
a
fractured
zone
in
the
quartzite
scarcely
25
feet
wide.
The
other
one-third
of
the
water
issues
from
numerous
outlets
in
alluvium,
within
250
feet
east
or
west
of
the
main
source,
and
with
temperatures
as
much
as
9°
lower
than
that
of
the
main
source.
Doubtless
all
sources of
warm
water
should be
controlled
sooner
or
later,
but
at
present
the
warmest
two-thirds
should be
segregated
from
the
sources
of
cooler
water.
It
seems
that
the
minor
sources
of
water
that
issues
from
local
alluvium
may
be
regarded
as
leakage from
a
central
or
main
conduit.
It
would
therefore
be
advisable
to
enclose
the
minor
sources
in
walls
of
impermeable
material,
making
a
tight
seal
with.the
bedrock
and
rising
above
the
present outlets
so
as
to
form
pools
in
which
water
levels
would
lie
several
feet
above
the
present
outlets.
Back
pressure
MEASURES
FOR
IMPROVING
THE
WARM
SPRINGS
37
would
thus
be
created,
which
would
tend
to
force
the
water
to
rise
in
the
central
conduit,
probably
at
the
present
temperature
of
that
portion.
The
question
has
been
raised
whether
it
would be
possible
by
drilling
to
intercept
the
main
or
central
conduit
at
depth
and
permit
the
water
to
rise
directly
to
the
surface,
probably
with
less
loss
of
heat
than
takes
place
in
the
natural
conduit.
All
that
can
be
learned
of
the
local
geology
and
inferred
concerning
the
path
of
the
rising
water
indicates
that
the
chance
of
intercepting
the
natural
conduit
at
a
depth,
say,
of
500
feet,
by
one
or
a
few
vertical
holes,
is
very
small.
For
the
increase
in
temperature
that
might
be
expected,
it
seems
that
the
expenditure
would
not
be
warranted.
INDEX
Abstract__________
Acknowledgments
for
aid .
Agriculture,
development
of.
Page
1
2
3
21
Analyses
'of
spring
stream,
add
well
waters...
17-26
Barker
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of______
17
discharge
and
temperature
of_.
____
10
geologic
relations
of____________
10,34
location
of_________________
10,19
Black
Sulphur
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of_
17
location
and
general
features
of______
14
Blue
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of
_______
17
chemical
character
of
water
of.. ____
15
discharge
and
temperature
of.______
13
location
of____.____._....___
13,19
Brown's
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of
_____
17
discharge
and
temperature
of__..___
4,10
geologic
relations
of.____________
34
location
of
_________________
10,19
Carolina
gneiss,
general
features
of______
26
geologic
relations
pf,
to
springs._____
14
structural
relations
of__________
31
thermal
gradient
in
well
drilled
in.
___
34
Cascade
Branch,
analysis
of
water
of....
__
18
Central
Upland,
relations
of
_________
3
Chalybeate,
springs
at,
chemical
character
of
water
of_.....______...
1&-14,15
springs
at,
discharge
and
temperature
of..
14
Chalybeate
Spring
(at
White
Sulphur
Springs),
analysis
of
water
of__
17
location
of__________________
14,19
Chalybeate
Spring
Nos.
1-3,
analysis
of
water
of....... ......................
17
Chalybeate
Spring
No.
4,
analysis
of
water
of.
18
Chattahoocb.ee
River,
relation
of
streams
of
area
to_______________
3
Chemical
character
of
the
waters,
data
on__
15-20
Cold
Spring, analyses
of
gases
from____..
21
analysis
of
water
of____________
17
discharge
of,
relation
of,
to
rainfall__
12,
pi.
5
general
features
of..____________
11-12
location
of.._...__..-.---_____...
11,19
source
of
water
of_____________
35-36
temperature
of____________
__
12
Cold
Spring
Branch,
discharge
of._.__._
13,25
discharge
of,
relation
of,
to
rainfall____
35
Cold
springs, analyses
of
waters
of._____
17-18
general
features
of...___....__.__
11-14
summary
of._..______.._____
14
Cold
waters,
chemical
character
of_____
15-16
Columbus,
Qa.,
rainfall
at__________
22
Cove,
features
of
the______________
3,32
Cunningham
granite,
general
features
of___
30
Dikes, diabase,
general
features
of.-----------
30
Dowdell
Knob,
features
of_________..
3,30
Discharge~of.stream&,and-sprkigs,..__.__
4,
6-9,23-25,
pis.
4,7,8
program
of
measurements
of..____...
21
See
also
individual
springs.
Page
Discharge
of
Warm
Springs,
relation
of,
to
rainfall
and
ground-water
level.
23,
pi.
4
Faults
in
the
area .
31
Field
studlte^durmW
of..
2
Flint
River,
relation
of
streams
of
area
to
3
Folds
in
the
area. .------ . - -
31-32
Fuller
well,
analysis
of
water
oL
18
Gases
in
the
spring
waters,
occurrence
and
analyses
of.
21
Geology
of
the
area_._ ...
25-32,
pis.
1,
2
Georgia
Warm
Springs
Foundation,
property
of......
4
property
of,
proposed
measures
for
im-
provement
of
springs
on....
36-37
Gill
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of
18
location
of
20
Greenville
Plateau,
erosion
and
gullying
of...
3
general
features
of...-
2-3
Griffin,
Ga.,
thermal
gradient
in
well
near....
34
Ground-water
level,
fluctuations
of,
in
wells.
23,
pi.
6
relation
of
discharge
of
Warm
Springs
to
rainfall
and . .
23,
pi.
4
Heat
of
Warm
Springs
water,
source
of.
34-35
Hollis
quartzite,
general
features
of
27-29
relation
of
springs
to.
10,13,33,34,35-36
structural
relations
of
31,32,33,34
thickness
of.... ._ .
4,28
Igneous
rocks,
general
features
of.
30
Kings
Gap
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of-...
17
location
of...
19
LaGrange,
Ga.,
thermal
gradient
in
well
near.
34-35
Lamar,
W.
L.,
chemical
analyses
of
water
by.
17-18
Lifsey
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of.
17
discharge
and
temperature
of
_.
_
10
geologic
relations
of .
34
location
of....
10,18
Manchester
High
School
well,
analysis
of
water
of... . .
18
chemical
character
of
water
of
15
Manchester
reservoir,
analysis
of
water
of
18
Manchester
schist,
general
features
of..
29
relation
of
warm
springs
to...
4,34
structural
relations
of____________
33,34
Mathis
well,
analysis
of
water
of .-. -.
18
Mill
Creek,
discharge
measurements
of
_
__
24
Mill
Creek
Basin,
study
of
rainfall
in. .....
35
Mountain
streams,
analyses
of
water
of___
18
Mount
Hope
Branch,
analysis
of
water
of....
18
North
Spring,
analyses
of
gases
from..___.
21
analysis
of
water
of_______...
17
discharge
of .
12,
13,
pi.
5
general
features
of____....
11-12
leoflftionof-_
11,10
temperature
of.... .
12
Oak
Mountain,
features
of.
39
40
INDEX
page
Oak
Mountain
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of_
17
chemical
character
of
water
of.._____
15
discharge
and
temperature
of.
______
14
geologic
relations
of
____________
14
location
of , ___.
________
14,19
Parkman
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of____
17
discharge
and
temperature
of_______
8
geologic
relations
of_________.,__
34
location
of
_________________
8,19
Pine Mountain,
features
of_._______
3
streams
on,
analyses
of
water
of_____
18
temperature
in
wells
near_________
4
warm
springs
near,
geologic
problems
pre-
sented
by __.___.___
1
Pine
Mountain
area,
ground-water
level
in,
observations
of_________
22,
pi.
6
ground-water
level
in,
relation
of.
to
rain-
fall.__._____.______
23,
pi.
6
rainfall
measurements
in_________
22
stream
discharge
in___.____
23,
pis.
7,
8
Pine
Mountain
divide,
comparison
of
run-off
north
and
south
of________
24-26
Pine
Mountain
formation,
occurrence
and
character
of___.________
4
Pine
Mountain
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of
17
location
of
____
_____________
19
Public
Works
Administration,
funds
allotted
by._______.____....__
1
Rainfall,
measurements
of__________
22
relation
of,
to
discharge
of
Warm
Springs.23,
pi.
4
to
fluctuations
of
groundwater
level.23,
pi.
6
weekly,
at
Roosevelt
farm_______
22,
pi.
5
Red
Sulphur
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of
___
17
location
and
general
features
of..____
14
Roan
gneiss,
occurrence
of
__________
27
Rock
formations,
general
features
of_____
25-3]
Roosevelt
farm,
rainfall
at_____
12,22,
pis.
4,5
well
on,
fluctuations
in
water
level
in.23, pis.
4,6
Run-off,
studies
of_______________
23-25
Scope
of
investigation____.________
2
Snelson
granite,
general
features
of...____
26-27
South
Spring
No.
1,
analysis
of
water
of __
.
17
South
Springs, discharge
and
temperature
of..
13
genera]
features
of _ ...__
12-13
location
of . ..._________....
32,19
Sparks
Creek,
analysis
of
water
of______
18
Sparks
schist,
general
features
of._______
27
Streams,
discharge
of________
23-25,
pis.
7,8
Structural
features_____________
31-32,33
Surface
features... ____________
2-3
Surface
waters,
analyses
of__________
18
Talbotton,
Qa.,
average
air
temperature
at__
4
rainfall
at _
22
Taylor
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of______
17
discharge
and
temperature
of_______
11
geologic
relations
of ..
34
location
of___.
_____..
____.
_
11,18
Temperature,
in
wells. _..__
34-35
of
air_____ ____ ____....
4
of
spring
water.
See
individual
springs.
Tertiary
(?)
and
later
sedimentary
rocks,
gen-
eral
features
of . __-
30-31
Thermal
gradients
in
wells... __....
34-35
Page
Thundering
Spring,
analyses
of
gases
from__
21
analysis
of
water
of... ..___.____
17
discharge
and
temperature
of..,_____
10
geologic
relations
of __ ___
34
location
of_________________
10,1&
spring
tributary
to,
analysis
of
water
of_
17
Towah'ga
fault,
pre-Cambrian
rocks
north
of.
26-27
pre-Cambrian
rocks
south
of_______
27-30
relation
of
geologic
formations
to_____
31,34
relation
of
warm
springs
to... . ..
33,34
Trammel
farm,
rainfall
at..____ __
22
Trammel's
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of.___
17
discharge
and temperature
of
13
geologic
relations
of. _
13
location
of.____._.___ __
13,19
Triassic
igneous
rocks,
general
features
of
30
Wacoochee
belt,
relation
of
warm
springs
to.
4,34
structural
relations
of
rocks
of... ___
31
Warm
Springs,
analyses
of
gases
from
21
analyses
of
water
of
17
discharge
of..
4,6-9,
pi.
4
methods
of
measurement
of
6
relation
of,
to
rainfall
and
ground-
water
level .___ ... .
23,
pi.
4
history
of
improvements
at...
4-5
measures
recommended
for
improving.;
36-37
sources
of
supply
of
5
structure
of
rocks
in
vicinity
of. .
33
temperature
of
4,5-6
water
of,
source
of..
32-33
source
of
heat
of
34-35
Warm
Springs
area,
map
of,
showing
sources
of
warm water,
pools,
drains,
etc.
pi,
3
Warm
Springs
quadrangle,
geologic
map
of
pi.
1
location
of,
map
showing
pi.
2
Warm
springs,
analyses
of
waters
of,
17
distribution
of.
3
relation
of,
to
Hollis
quartzite
36
summary
of... ^
11
Warm
waters,
chemical
character
of
15
Wells,
analyses
of
waters
of
18
temperature
of
water
of .
'
4
thermal
gradient
in.
34-35
water
levels
in s,
23,
pi.
6
West
Point,
Ga.,
average
air
temperature
at,.
4
rainfall
at........... - .-
22
White
Sulphur
Spring,
analysis
of
water
of
17
general
features
of..
14
hydrogen
sulphide
in.
16
White
Sulphur
Springs,
chemical
character
of
water
of
springs
at i
16
general
features
of
springs
at.
t
14
geologic
relations
of
springs
at
14
location
of
springs
at .
M
Willingham
Spring
No.
1,
analysis
of
water
of.
18
location
of
20
Woodbury,
Ga.,
rainfall
at
22
Woodbury
Spring
Nos.
1
and
2,
analyses
of
water
of.._
18
.
location
of -
20
Woodland
gneiss,
general
features
of
29-30
Yant,
W.
P.,
chemical
analyses
by .
21
Youngs
Mill,
Ga.,
thermal
gradient
in
well
at.
34
o
The
use
of
the
subjoined
mailing
label
to
return
this
report
will
be
official
business,
and
no
postage
stamps
will
be
required
UNITED
STATES
PENALTY
FOR
PRIVATE
USE
TO
AVOP
DEPARTMENT
OF
THE
INTERIOR
PAYMENT
OF
POSTAGE,
woo
GEOLOGICAL.
SURVEY
OFFICIAL
BUSINESS
This
label
can
be
used
only
for
returning
official
publications.
The
address
must
not
Be
changed.
U.
S.
GEOLOGICAL
SURVEY,